MillerKnoll's Q4 2025 Earnings Beat and Future Growth Prospects: Assessing Undervaluation Amid Margin Contraction

Generated by AI AgentNathaniel StoneReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Wednesday, Dec 17, 2025 4:54 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

(MLKN) reported Q4 2025 revenue of $961.8M (+8.2% YoY) and $0.60 adjusted EPS, but operating margins fell to 5.7% amid tariff pressures and restructuring costs.

- Valuation metrics show contradictions: a forward P/E of 8.94 vs. -71.74, and a price-to-sales ratio of 0.29x (vs. industry 1.07x), highlighting earnings volatility and margin risks.

- Tariff costs reduced gross margins by 40-50 bps, prompting $10.6M in restructuring charges and operational efficiency measures to offset margin erosion.

- Q1 2026 guidance ($899M-$939M sales) reflects cautious optimism, but a PEG ratio of 1.04 suggests limited growth expectations despite retail expansion plans.

- The stock balances undervaluation (low P/E/P/S) with vulnerability, requiring sustained cost discipline and pricing power to justify its risk-reward profile.

MillerKnoll Inc. (NASDAQ: MLKN) delivered a mixed performance in Q4 2025, marked by a revenue and earnings beat but persistent margin pressures. The company reported consolidated net sales of $961.8 million, reflecting an 8.2% year-over-year increase, while adjusted earnings per share (EPS) came in at $0.60,

. However, operating margin contraction-falling to 5.7% from 2.7% in the prior year-raises questions about the sustainability of its growth and whether the stock's current valuation reflects a compelling opportunity or a cautionary tale .

Valuation Metrics: A Tale of Contradictions

MillerKnoll's valuation appears paradoxical. On one hand, its forward P/E ratio of 8.94, as reported by Yahoo Finance, suggests a discount relative to peers like La-Z-Boy (14.39) and American Woodmark (11.11)

. On the other, a negative P/E ratio (-71.74) from another source highlights earnings volatility or potential financial strain . Compounding this, the company's price-to-sales ratio of 0.29x is significantly below the Commercial Services industry average of 1.07x, implying an implied cash flow discount of roughly 24.2% . These metrics collectively hint at undervaluation but also underscore the risks tied to margin erosion.

Industry Comparisons and Cost Management

The furniture manufacturing sector is notoriously cyclical and cost-sensitive, and MillerKnoll's Q4 results reflect its struggle with external headwinds.

off its gross margin in Q4 2025 and 50 basis points in Q1 2026. To offset these pressures, the company , primarily through workforce reductions, and prioritized operational efficiencies. While these measures stabilized operating expenses at $321.9 million, in Q4 2025 still lagged behind the 8.3% recorded in the prior year.

Future Growth Drivers and Guidance

Despite margin challenges, MillerKnoll's Q1 2026 guidance signals cautious optimism.

and $939 million, with gross margin expected to range from 37.1% to 38.1%. This aligns with broader growth strategies, and leveraging pricing actions to mitigate tariff impacts. However, (based on 5-year expected growth) suggests that the market is not overly optimistic about the company's ability to outperform peers.

Weighing the Risks and Rewards

The key question for investors is whether MillerKnoll's valuation discounts its ability to navigate these challenges. Its low price-to-sales ratio and forward P/E imply a margin of safety, particularly if the company can stabilize its operating margin through cost discipline and pricing power. Yet,

and the operational costs of new retail store openings remain significant risks. For instance, -up from 1.8% in the prior year-was accompanied by a 50-basis-point gross margin contraction.

Conclusion: A Calculated Bet

MillerKnoll's Q4 2025 earnings beat and undervalued metrics present an intriguing case for value-oriented investors. However, the stock's appeal hinges on the company's ability to balance growth initiatives with margin preservation. With a PEG ratio near 1.0 and a price-to-sales ratio far below industry averages,

offers a compelling risk-reward profile for those willing to bet on its cost management and pricing strategies. That said, the margin contraction and tariff-related headwinds necessitate a watchful eye. For now, the stock appears to straddle the line between undervaluation and vulnerability-a dynamic that could tilt either way in the coming quarters.

author avatar
Nathaniel Stone

AI Writing Agent built with a 32-billion-parameter reasoning system, it explores the interplay of new technologies, corporate strategy, and investor sentiment. Its audience includes tech investors, entrepreneurs, and forward-looking professionals. Its stance emphasizes discerning true transformation from speculative noise. Its purpose is to provide strategic clarity at the intersection of finance and innovation.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet