MicroStrategy Outperforms Bitcoin, Tech Stocks with 31% 3-Month Gain

Michael Saylor, the executive chairman of MicroStrategy, recently shared performance charts on his X account that highlighted the superior returns of MicroStrategy (MSTR) compared to Bitcoin (BTC) and several prominent tech stocks over both three-month and one-year periods. The charts, posted on May 24, 2025, underscored MSTR's leading position in terms of return on investment (ROI).

According to the three-month chart, MSTR recorded a 31% return, outpacing all other assets. Bitcoin followed with a 19% gain, while gold (GLD) and Microsoft (MSFT) returned 14% and 11%, respectively. Tesla (TSLA) rose 3%, and Nvidia (NVDA) added 1%. Apple (AAPL) posted the largest decline in the group, falling 21% over the same period. The one-year chart further cemented MSTR's dominance, showing a 139% return. Tesla ranked second at 95%, followed by Bitcoin at 58%, gold at 44%, and Meta (META) at 35%. Nvidia gained 26%, while Google (GOOG) was the only asset with a negative return, down 3% year-over-year.

MicroStrategy’s stock performance is closely tied to Bitcoin’s market movements due to its substantial holdings of the cryptocurrency. As of May 24, 2025, the company holds approximately 576,230 BTC, making it the largest corporate Bitcoin holder globally. This significant position links MSTR’s stock value closely to Bitcoin’s price action, as the company has acquired Bitcoin through a mix of corporate funds and debt offerings, resulting in leveraged exposure to BTC. This capital structure aligns its market performance with fluctuations in Bitcoin’s valuation, making MSTR a popular proxy for Bitcoin exposure among investors.

In an interview and post on X, Saylor addressed Bitcoin investment strategies during a new market peak. He argued that purchasing Bitcoin at elevated prices remains rational when viewed from a long-term perspective. He cited four-year holding data, noting that the majority of long-term investors have seen gains regardless of market entry point. Saylor emphasized that currency devaluation and inflation reduce the value of traditional reserves, making Bitcoin a reliable asset for maintaining value over time. He also warned against waiting for lower prices, stating, “If you’re not buying bitcoin at the all-time high, you’re leaving money on the table,” reinforcing his stance that time spent in the market matters more than timing market entry.

Saylor also predicted that Bitcoin could soon become less accessible due to growing institutional demand. He said that once traditional banks approve BTC as a financial instrument, the supply available to individual investors may shrink. Several market analysts support this outlook, pointing to signs that large financial institutions are preparing to enter the crypto sector. If institutional activity rises, increased demand could create a supply squeeze, driving prices further and leaving fewer opportunities for late adopters. As institutional frameworks evolve, Bitcoin’s availability on public markets may narrow, mirroring previous examples where early investors gained significant advantages due to early access. Saylor maintains that acquiring BTC before this transition may be key to long-term capital preservation.