It seems like your message might be incomplete or empty. Could you please provide more details or clarify your question? I'm here to help! .

think> Okay, let's tackle this. The user wants me to transform the given Chinese text into a concise news headline following specific rules. First, I need to make sure I understand all the requirements. The company name is Alvotech. The percentage change is 11.36363636%, which needs to be rounded to two decimal places. That would be 11.36%. The time period is intraday, so I should note that. Next, the reasons for the price movement are two points: the EMA CHMP recommendation in the EU on Sept 22, 2025, and Fujifilm's approval in Japan on Sept 19, 2025 for three biosimilars. I need to combine these into a brief reason without losing key info. The example output uses a structure where the first sentence includes the company, percentage, time, and the main reason. Then additional details follow. I should follow that. I need to check if the company name is kept unchanged. Alvotech is correct. The percentage is rounded properly. The time period is intraday. The reasons are both included, mentioning both the EU and Japan approvals, and the specific biosimilars. Wait, in the input, the second point mentions three biosimilars: AVT03, AVT05, AVT06. The first point mentions AVT03 and AVT05. So the Japan approval includes AVT06 as well. I should mention all three in the Japan part. Also, the dates are important. The EU recommendation was on Sept 22, and Japan on Sept 19. I should include those dates. Putting it all together: Alvotech surged 11.36% intraday as the EMA's CHMP recommended approval for AVT03 and AVT05 in the EU on Sept 22, 2025, and its partner Fujifilm received marketing authorization for the three biosimilars in Japan on Sept 19. Wait, the user's example had the company's focus in the second paragraph. But the user's rules don't mention including the company's business focus unless it's part of the reason. The example included it in the output, but the rules don't specify that. The rules say to provide a brief reason for the price movement, retaining key info. The company's focus isn't part of the reason here; the approvals are. So maybe I don't need to include the company's business description. Looking back at the example, the user included the company's focus in the second paragraph, but the rules don't explicitly require that. The example might be a bit of a red herring. The key is to include the company name, percentage, time period, and the reason. So in this case, the reason is the two approvals. So the headline should start with the company name, the percentage, the time period, then the reasons. The example's output includes more details after the first sentence, but the user's transformation rules don't specify splitting into paragraphs. The example shows a two-paragraph output, but the user's instruction says "concise news headline". However, the example includes a line break. Maybe the user expects a similar structure. Wait, the example's output has a line break with "/n". But in the transformation rules, there's no mention of paragraphs. The user might just want a single line but with a line break for the second part. So in the output, I can follow the example's structure. So the first part is the headline with the key info, and the second part adds more details. Let me structure it that way. First sentence: Alvotech surged 11.36% intraday as the European Medicines Agency (EMA)’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended approval for its biosimilars AVT03 and AVT05 in the EU on September 22, 2025, and its commercial partner Fujifilm received marketing authorization for AVT03, AVT05, and AVT06 in Japan on September 19, 2025. Then, if needed, add a second sentence if there's more info. But according to the input, there are two points. The example included more details after the first sentence, so maybe I should follow that. Wait, the input has two bullet points. The first is the EU approval recommendation, the second is the Japan approval. The example output includes both in the first sentence. The user's example output starts with the company surge, then the reason, which includes both events. So I can combine both reasons into the first sentence. I should check for any trailing zeros in the percentage. 11.36363.