Hello! It looks like your message might be empty. How can I assist you today? Feel free to ask any question or share what's on your mind! .

think> Okay, let me try to work through this step by step. The user wants me to transform a given text into a concise news headline following specific rules. Let me start by reading the input carefully. First, the company name is Workiva. The percentage change is 12.11789063%, which I need to round to two decimal places. That would be 12.12%. The time period is intraday, so I should mention "intraday trading". Now, the reason for the price movement. The input has three points: Q3 earnings report with revenue growth, guidance upgrades, and large contract growth. I need to summarize these concisely. The key points are the revenue exceeding expectations, the EPS beat, the raised guidance for Q4 and full year, and the increase in large contracts driving subscription revenue. I should combine these into a brief reason. Maybe start with the earnings report and the revenue and EPS results. Then mention the guidance upgrades, and the contract growth as the third point. Need to make sure it's all in one sentence without being too long. Also, check if the dates are important. The input mentions 2025年11月5日 for both the earnings report and the guidance changes. Since the headline is about the price movement, the date might not be necessary unless it's critical. But the example didn't include dates, so maybe just focus on the company's announcements. Putting it all together: "Workiva surged 12.12% in intraday trading, driven by the company's Q3 earnings report showing $224 million in revenue (21% YoY growth, exceeding estimates by $5.04 million) and non-GAAP EPS of $0.55 (above expectations). Workiva also raised its Q4 2025 revenue guidance to $234–236 million and full-year 2025 guidance to $880 million–$882 million, surpassing market consensus. Additionally, large contracts (over $500,000) grew 42% YoY, boosting subscription revenue by 23%." Wait, let me check the numbers again. The revenue is $2.24亿, which is 224 million. The guidance is 2.34-2.36亿, so 234-236 million. The full-year guidance is 8.8-8.82亿, which is 880-882 million. Also, the large contracts are over 50万美元, which is $500,000. I need to make sure the units are correct. The example used "1.95MW" as is, so maybe just keep the numbers as given but in English notation. Also, the user mentioned to retain key information, so all three points should be included. However, the example output for Pineapple Energy Inc. included the subsidiary and project details in the first part of the headline and the company focus in the second part. But in this case, the user might expect the main reason in the first sentence and the additional details in the second part. Wait, the example has two paragraphs. The first part includes the surge and the reason, and the second part is the company's focus. But the user's instruction says "a brief reason for the price movement", so maybe all the key reasons should be in the first part, followed by additional details if needed. But the example's output has the first sentence with the surge and the reason, then the second part is the company's focus. So maybe here, after the surge and the reasons (earnings, guidance, contracts), the additional info about the company's business model could be included. However, the input doesn't provide that for Workiva, so maybe just the first part is sufficient. Wait, the input for Workiva doesn't mention the company's focus like in the Pineapple example. So perhaps the user expects only the surge, the time period, and the reasons for the price movement, without a separate paragraph about the company's business. Let me check the rules again. Rule 4 says "Provide a brief reason for the price movement, retaining key information." So the key info is the three points: earnings beat, guidance upgrade, contract growth. The example includes two paragraphs, but maybe in this case, since the company's focus isn't mentioned, we just need to include the reasons in one paragraph. However, the user's example output for Pineapple has two paragraphs, with the first being the surge and reason, the second being the company's focus. But in the current case, the input doesn't mention the company's focus, so perhaps we just have one paragraph. But the user's example includes both the surge reason and the company's focus. However, in the current input, there's no info about Workiva.