VS MEDIA shares rise 61.93% premarket after announcing delayed reverse split effective date to January 12, 2026 due to regulatory delays.

think> Okay, let's start by understanding the user's query. They want me to act as a financial analyst and explain the stock price movement of VS MEDIA Holdings based on recent news. The stock is up 61.93% in premarket trading, and there are several news events provided. First, I need to determine the direction and percentage of the stock movement. The user provided "盘前 premarketup61.93181818%", which translates to a significant premarket increase. Rounded to two decimal places, that's 61.93%. Next, I need to look at the recent news events. The main news is about the delay in the effective date of the reverse stock split from January 9 to January 12, 2026, due to regulatory delays. There are multiple reasons listed, all pointing to the same announcement. The other news events mention previous announcements like the 1-for-20 share combination, compliance with Nasdaq standards, and strategic acquisitions, but those are older. The most recent news is the delay in the reverse split. Now, I have to evaluate if these news events are relevant. The delay in the reverse split is directly related to the company's stock structure. Reverse splits are usually done to meet listing requirements or to make the stock more attractive. A delay could be seen as a negative because it might indicate regulatory issues or operational inefficiencies. However, the stock is up sharply, which seems contradictory. Wait, but maybe the market is interpreting the delay as a positive? That doesn't make sense at first glance. Let me check again. Wait, the user mentioned the stock is up 61.93% premarket. That's a massive jump. The news is about a delay in the reverse split. Typically, a reverse split is seen as a bearish sign because it's often done by companies with low stock prices to meet minimum requirements. However, if the market perceives the delay as a positive, perhaps there's another angle. Maybe the delay allows the company to resolve regulatory issues, leading to a more stable structure. Alternatively, maybe there's a misunderstanding here. The user's input might have a typo. Let me check the news again. The news states that the reverse split is delayed due to regulatory delays. The company had previously announced a reverse split, and now it's postponed. Usually, a reverse split is a negative event, but the stock is up. This contradiction might mean that the market is reacting to something else. Wait, the user provided "Reason 1" and "Reason 4" both mention the delay. The other reasons include older news like the 1-for-20 share combination, but that's a different event. The recent news is the delay in the reverse split. Wait, but a reverse split is a consolidation of shares, which can make the stock price higher. If the reverse split is delayed, maybe investors are interpreting it as a positive because the company might be avoiding a forced reverse split, or perhaps there's a mistake in the news. Alternatively, maybe the delay is seen as a positive because the company is resolving issues, which could lead to a more favorable outcome. However, typically, delays in such corporate actions are seen as negative because they indicate problems. But the stock is up 61.93%, which is a huge gain. That suggests that the market is reacting positively. However, the news about the delay seems negative. This contradiction is confusing. Maybe there's an error in the user's input? Let me check the news content again. Looking at the news content for Reason 1 and 4: the company is delaying the reverse split to January 12 due to regulatory delays. The summary mentions that the reverse split was initially scheduled for January 9. The content in Reason 1 says the company is amending the effective date. The Quiver AI summary also states the delay is due to regulatory clearances. The potential positives listed include the reverse split as a structural change that can enhance stock performance. But the delay is a negative because it shows regulatory issues. Wait, the stock is up in premarket, but the news is about a delay. This seems contradictory. Maybe the market is interpreting the delay as a positive? Or perhaps there's another news event that's causing the jump. The user provided multiple news reasons, but most are about the reverse split delay. The other news includes a 1-for-20 share combination, but that's from 5 days ago. The stock's current movement is in response to the latest news. Alternatively, maybe the user made a mistake in the percentage. A 61.93% increase in premarket is extremely high and unusual. Let me verify if the news could have a positive angle. For example, if the reverse split is a positive step, but delayed, maybe the market is reacting to the fact that the reverse split is happening, not the delay. However, the news is about the delay.