MDST: High Yield, But Suffers in Rising Markets

Generated by AI AgentVictor HaleReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Friday, Oct 24, 2025 3:08 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- MDST offers a 10.43% yield, higher than peers like AMLP, but its midstream energy focus exposes it to sector-specific risks and volatility.

- The ETF's 24.63% 200-day volatility and heavy concentration in top 15 holdings (86.84%) undermine its defensive asset potential during market downturns.

- Rising interest rates challenge MDST's MLPs through higher borrowing costs, contrasting with Treasury bonds' historical outperformance in tightening cycles.

- Defensive alternatives like TLT and select REITs provide better capital preservation, making MDST more suitable for yield enhancement in balanced portfolios.

In the pursuit of income generation, investors often face a critical trade-off: the allure of high yields versus the risks of capital preservation. The (MDST) epitomizes this dilemma. , according to . However, its performance during market volatility and rising interest rate environments raises questions about its suitability as a defensive asset. This analysis evaluates MDST's role in a defensive income portfolio, weighing its yield advantages against its susceptibility to market downturns and rate hikes.

MDST's Strategy and Yield Appeal

MDST's investment strategy centers on North American midstream energy companies and (MLPs), with at least 80% of assets allocated to these sectors. The fund leverages active management and to enhance income, , per

. This high yield is particularly attractive in a low-interest-rate environment, where traditional fixed-income assets struggle to compete. For instance, during early 2022, , respectively, , according to .

However, MDST's appeal comes with caveats. The fund is highly concentrated, , per

, and its non-diversified structure amplifies exposure to sector-specific risks. While historically reduced leverage to mitigate interest rate sensitivity, their performance during market downturns remains a concern.

Volatility and Performance in Downturns

MDST's volatility is stark. , which far exceeds the stability of defensive assets like U.S. Treasury bonds. During the 2020 market crash, for example, energy infrastructure and MLP ETFs like AMLP underperformed as investors fled cyclicals for safer havens, according to

. Similarly, in 2008, midstream MLPs faced pressure from falling commodity prices and reduced demand, lagging behind Treasury bonds, which gained as investors sought liquidity, as noted in that Seeking Alpha analysis.

While MDST's covered call strategy aims to cushion declines, its performance during broader market crashes remains mixed. For instance, the Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF (WEEI), a sister fund, , the GlobeNewswire release reported, suggesting that MDST's midstream focus may not fully insulate it from sector-wide shocks.

Defensive Income Assets: Bonds and REITs

Defensive assets like Treasury bonds and offer contrasting risk-return profiles. During the 2008 and 2020 crashes, long-term Treasuries (e.g., iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, TLT) outperformed equities as investors prioritized capital preservation, as discussed in the Seeking Alpha analysis referenced above. For example, . REITs, meanwhile, showed mixed results. While sectors like retail and office properties underperformed in 2008 and 2020, logistics and data center REITs rebounded due to e-commerce growth, as noted in

.

Compared to these assets, MDST's midstream focus exposes it to cyclical risks. Unlike REITs, which can benefit from sector-specific demand shifts, midstream MLPs are more sensitive to energy price swings and interest rate hikes. This makes

a less reliable capital-preserving asset during downturns, despite its high yield.

Risks in Rising Rate Environments

Rising interest rates pose a dual challenge for MDST. First, higher rates increase borrowing costs for midstream MLPs, potentially squeezing margins. Second, investors may shift to fixed-income assets like Treasuries, which offer stable returns with lower volatility; ETFdb analysis has discussed this dynamic. While midstream MLPs have reduced leverage to mitigate rate sensitivity, their historical correlation with the 10-Year Treasury yield (modestly positive over the past decade) suggests they remain vulnerable.

In contrast, Treasury bonds typically thrive in rising rate environments when central banks signal tighter monetary policy. For example, during the 2022 rate hike cycle, TLT's yield climbed as investors priced in inflation-fighting measures. MDST, by contrast, , according to the ETFdb MDST guide.

Conclusion: Weighing the Trade-Offs

MDST's high yield makes it an enticing option for income-focused investors, particularly in low-rate environments. However, its volatility and sector-specific risks limit its effectiveness as a defensive asset during market downturns or rising rate cycles. For investors prioritizing capital preservation, Treasury bonds and select REITs offer more stability.

A balanced approach might involve allocating a smaller portion of a defensive income portfolio to MDST for yield enhancement, while relying on bonds and high-quality REITs for downside protection. As always, the key lies in aligning asset choices with individual risk tolerance and market outlook.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet