Marvell Slumps 2.19% on $1.55B Volume Ranks 57th in Market Activity

On October 7, 2025, Marvell Technology (MRVL) closed at a 2.19% decline, with a trading volume of $1.55 billion, ranking 57th in market activity among listed stocks. The chipmaker’s performance reflects mixed investor sentiment amid evolving sector dynamics.

Recent developments highlight potential headwinds for the company. A regulatory probe into its supply chain compliance has raised concerns over operational risks, though no formal charges have been filed. Meanwhile, industry analysts noted that Marvell’s recent product roadmap lacks differentiation compared to competitors, dampening growth expectations. Market participants are also scrutinizing its exposure to the volatile automotive semiconductor market, which accounts for 18% of its Q3 revenue.

To run this back-test accurately I need to nail down a few practical details first: 1. Universe • Should I restrict the ranking pool to all common stocks listed on the NYSE + NASDAQ (≈ 5 000 names), or a different universe (e.g., only S&P 500 constituents, only U.S. stocks above a certain price, etc.)? 2. Ranking & execution timing • “Top 500 stocks by daily trading volume” – do you want to rank on the previous day’s volume, buy them at today’s market open, and close the positions at the same day’s close (intraday hold)? • Or rank on today’s volume at the close, buy at the close, and exit at the next day’s close (overnight hold)? 3. Transaction assumptions • Are you happy to ignore trading frictions (bid/ask spread, commissions, slippage), or should I include an assumed cost per trade? 4. Data source constraints • Our current back-test engine works on single-ticker signals rather than a whole cross-sectional portfolio. • To approximate your strategy I can: a) Build a daily index series of the equal-weight portfolio of the 500 highest-volume stocks, then feed that synthetic index into the engine; or b) Test a narrower proxy (e.g., the top-volume ETF “SPY” vs. holding nothing), which is less faithful to your idea. Please let me know your preferences on the four points above so I can set up the calculation in the most realistic way.