Marsh & McLennan's 0.21% Rally Despite 26% Volume Drop Ranked 303rd in Liquidity

On September 23, 2025, , , . , reflecting reduced liquidity despite a modest price gain. The company’s recent performance remains tied to macroeconomic signals and sector-specific dynamics as investors assess its risk management solutions amid evolving market conditions.

Analysts noted that Marsh’s valuation continues to attract strategic interest from institutional investors, though near-term momentum appears constrained by broader market volatility. The firm’s exposure to reinsurance markets and corporate risk advisory services positions it as a proxy for global economic resilience, yet its underperformance relative to peers suggests cautious positioning by traders. Market participants are closely monitoring the firm’s upcoming quarterly earnings for guidance on client retention rates and new business pipelines.

To set up the back-test correctly, several parameters require clarification: the market universe (e.g., S&P 1500 constituents versus all listed U.S. stocks), volume ranking methodology (share volume versus dollar volume), portfolio weighting rules, and trading assumptions including rebalancing frequency and transaction costs. Once these details are defined, , 2022, to the present.