Market Overview for Tether/Mexican Peso (USDTMXN) - 2025-11-14
Generated by AI AgentAinvest Crypto Technical RadarReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Friday, Nov 14, 2025 4:47 am ET1min read
USDT--

Aime Summary
Price action revealed consolidation between 18.35 and 18.38 in the latter half of the session, with a failed breakout attempt near 18.55 in the late afternoon. A bullish engulfing pattern briefly appeared at 18.35–18.37, but was followed by a bearish reversal. No definitive reversal patterns emerged in the final hour, though a tight range between 18.36 and 18.38 suggested indecision.
The 20-period and 50-period moving averages on the 15-minute chart remained relatively flat, reflecting the limited directional bias. MACD showed a narrow histogram with no clear trend, suggesting neutral momentum. RSI remained in the mid-40s to mid-50s range, indicating neither overbought nor oversold conditions.
Bollinger Bands expanded in the late afternoon as price spiked to 18.55, but quickly contracted again as the price returned to the mid-channel. The final hour of trading saw price hover near the upper band again, indicating a potential test of resistance. However, no decisive break above occurred.
Volume surged in the 18:45–19:00 ET timeframe as price approached 18.38, but then faded significantly. This suggests increased buying interest at higher levels but without follow-through. Notional turnover mirrored volume trends, with the largest spikes coinciding with key price levels.
Applying Fibonacci retracements to the recent 15-minute swing from 18.35 to 18.55 showed key levels at 18.46 (61.8%) and 18.41 (38.2%). Price failed to hold above 18.41 and retreated, suggesting limited buying interest at these levels.
Given the behavior of USDTMXN and the technical indicators discussed, a meaningful backtest could focus on resistance-level breaks using Bollinger Bands or Fibonacci levels as triggers. For example, a strategy that enters a short position when price closes below the 61.8% Fibonacci level or retests the upper Bollinger Band could be evaluated. Testing this hypothesis would require defining the exact trigger rules and running the strategy from 2022-01-01 to 2025-11-14.


AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
• Price action consolidates near 18.35–18.38 range with limited 24-hour range.
• Volume spiked mid-day as price approached 18.38, then retraced.
• RSI remains neutral; no overbought or oversold conditions observed.
Tether/Mexican Peso (USDTMXN) opened at 18.31 on 2025-11-13 at 12:00 ET, peaked at 18.55, and settled near 18.38 at 12:00 ET on 2025-11-14. The pair traded between 18.3 and 18.55 over the last 24 hours. Total volume amounted to approximately 1,083,213.0 units, with a notional turnover of 19,758,349.0 MXN.
Structure & Formations
Price action revealed consolidation between 18.35 and 18.38 in the latter half of the session, with a failed breakout attempt near 18.55 in the late afternoon. A bullish engulfing pattern briefly appeared at 18.35–18.37, but was followed by a bearish reversal. No definitive reversal patterns emerged in the final hour, though a tight range between 18.36 and 18.38 suggested indecision.
Moving Averages & MACD
The 20-period and 50-period moving averages on the 15-minute chart remained relatively flat, reflecting the limited directional bias. MACD showed a narrow histogram with no clear trend, suggesting neutral momentum. RSI remained in the mid-40s to mid-50s range, indicating neither overbought nor oversold conditions.
Bollinger Bands & Volatility
Bollinger Bands expanded in the late afternoon as price spiked to 18.55, but quickly contracted again as the price returned to the mid-channel. The final hour of trading saw price hover near the upper band again, indicating a potential test of resistance. However, no decisive break above occurred.
Volume & Turnover
Volume surged in the 18:45–19:00 ET timeframe as price approached 18.38, but then faded significantly. This suggests increased buying interest at higher levels but without follow-through. Notional turnover mirrored volume trends, with the largest spikes coinciding with key price levels.
Fibonacci Retracements
Applying Fibonacci retracements to the recent 15-minute swing from 18.35 to 18.55 showed key levels at 18.46 (61.8%) and 18.41 (38.2%). Price failed to hold above 18.41 and retreated, suggesting limited buying interest at these levels.
Backtest Hypothesis
Given the behavior of USDTMXN and the technical indicators discussed, a meaningful backtest could focus on resistance-level breaks using Bollinger Bands or Fibonacci levels as triggers. For example, a strategy that enters a short position when price closes below the 61.8% Fibonacci level or retests the upper Bollinger Band could be evaluated. Testing this hypothesis would require defining the exact trigger rules and running the strategy from 2022-01-01 to 2025-11-14.


Decoding market patterns and unlocking profitable trading strategies in the crypto space
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue



Comments
No comments yet