Market Overview for Tether/Dai (USDTDAI) – November 2, 2025


• Price remained narrowly consolidated around 0.9998–0.9999 as Tether/Dai traded with minimal directional bias.
• Volatility showed slight expansion midday, but failed to generate meaningful breakouts above or below key levels.
• Turnover surged overnight with a volume spike above 200,000, suggesting increased activity in the USDTDAI pair.
• No strong reversal or continuation candlestick patterns emerged throughout the 24-hour period.
• Momentum indicators remain neutral, with no overbought or oversold signals recorded.
Tether/Dai (USDTDAI) opened at 0.9998 at 12:00 ET on November 1, reached a high of 1.0001, a low of 0.9996, and closed at 0.9999 at 12:00 ET on November 2. Total volume for the 24-hour period was approximately 2.99 million, with a turnover of 2.9999 million USDT (equivalent to the underlying DaiDAI-- volume, given the 1:1 peg). The pair exhibited minimal directional movement over the period, staying within a tight range.
Structure & Formations
The candlestick structure for USDTDAI over the 24-hour period showed a very tight range with no significant breakout attempts. Price repeatedly tested key levels such as 0.9998 and 0.9999 but lacked the momentum to break through either. The most notable candlestick formation occurred at 03:30 ET, where a bullish reversal pattern briefly lifted the price to 1.0001 after a dip to 0.9998. However, this failed to hold, and price retracted. No strong bearish or bullish engulfing patterns emerged, and the candlestick body sizes remained small, indicating indecision among traders.
Moving Averages
On the 15-minute chart, the 20-period and 50-period moving averages closely aligned, reinforcing the neutral bias in price. There was no meaningful divergence between the two, which typically signals a continuation of consolidation. Over the full 24-hour window, the pair hovered near the 20-period line without crossing it decisively. On the daily chart, the 50/100/200-period moving averages also remained in close alignment, with no clear short-term directional signal emerging. This suggests that the market remains in a low-volatility, range-bound phase.
MACD & RSI
The MACD line remained near the zero line throughout the 24-hour period, with the signal line tracking closely behind it. There were no significant divergences or crossovers that would suggest a shift in momentum. The RSI (14) hovered between 50 and 60, indicating a balanced state of buying and selling pressure. Neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) conditions developed, which suggests the market has not yet reached a point of exhaustion or exhaustion reversal. The indicators collectively point to a neutral, range-bound trading environment without clear directional signals.
Bollinger Bands
Price remained well within the Bollinger Bands, with the midband acting as a central reference point. There was no notable contraction or expansion in volatility over the 24-hour period, and the bands maintained a steady width. Price briefly touched the upper band at 1.0001 and the lower band at 0.9996, but these tests failed to generate follow-through. The relative position within the bands continued to suggest a continuation of the sideways range, with no strong breakouts or reversals observed.
Volume & Turnover
Volume showed a significant increase after 00:00 ET, particularly between 03:30 and 04:45 ET, when it exceeded 200,000 in a single 15-minute period. This increase in volume coincided with the temporary price spike to 1.0001. However, the failure to hold above that level suggested that the volume was not supporting a sustained move. Turnover mirrored the volume pattern, with a sharp increase during the overnight hours. There were no clear divergences between price and volume, but the lack of follow-through after the volume spike suggests the market may not be ready for a directional move.
Fibonacci Retracements
Applying Fibonacci retracements to the most recent 15-minute swing (from 0.9996 to 1.0001), the 38.2% and 61.8% levels corresponded to 0.99986 and 0.99994, respectively. These levels aligned closely with the price range observed over the 24-hour period. The fact that the price hovered near these levels without a decisive break suggests that the market is testing key retracement levels without committing to a breakout. No major Fibonacci levels from daily swings were tested during this period, which indicates that the pair remains in a tight, short-term trading range.
Backtest Hypothesis
Given the lack of readily available pricing or pattern-detection data for USDTDAI, running an automatic backtest for specific candlestick formations—such as the Hammer—is not currently feasible. However, based on the tight range and limited volatility observed in the last 24 hours, any backtest strategy for USDTDAI would need to account for a low-volatility environment. If the Hammer pattern were to be tested, it would likely require confirmation in the following bar to validate the reversal signal, but the current data does not support such analysis. For practical backtesting, it may be more effective to switch to a widely supported pair such as BTCUSDT or ETHUSDT, where historical pattern data is more accessible. Alternatively, a simpler momentum-based strategy—such as long on RSI divergence or a moving average crossover—could be more viable.
Decodificar los patrones del mercado y descubrir estrategias de trading rentables en el sector de las criptomonedas.
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.



Comments
No comments yet