Market Overview for Stellar/Yen (XLMJPY) on 2025-10-29

Wednesday, Oct 29, 2025 9:24 pm ET2min read
XLM--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- XLMJPY traded between 48.14-50.0 on 2025-10-29, closing at 49.32 after a bearish 19:30 ET candle.

- RSI hit oversold levels at 48.28 and rebounded, while Bollinger Bands showed repeated lower-band tests.

- Volume spiked at 19:30 ET (26,884.6) and 02:30 ET (26,920.0), confirming key price swings.

- 20 EMA reascended post-bearish phase, suggesting potential consolidation near 48.36-48.50 support.

• Price closed slightly higher at 49.32, up from the 12:00 ET open of 49.68, with a 24-hour high of 50.0 and a low of 48.14
• Volatility expanded during early hours, with a large bearish candle on 19:30 ET and a key rally forming late morning
• RSI hit oversold levels near 48.28 before recovering, suggesting potential buying interest at recent lows
• Volume spiked sharply at 19:30 ET and again at 02:30 ET, aligning with major price swings
• Bollinger Bands show price has retested the lower band multiple times, indicating potential consolidation ahead

The Stellar/Yen (XLMJPY) pair opened at 49.68 on 2025-10-29 at 12:00 ET-1 and closed at 49.32 by 12:00 ET. The 24-hour high reached 50.0 while the low dropped to 48.14. Total volume amounted to 687,063.0 units, with a notional turnover of 33,003,922.00 JPY. The price action revealed a complex intraday reversal pattern, with bearish momentum shifting to a tentative rally late in the session.

Structure & Formations

The 15-minute chart displayed a key bearish engulfing candle at 19:30 ET, opening at 49.78 and closing at 49.37—a sharp 41-tick decline. This was followed by a bullish reversal forming from 22:00 ET onward, culminating in a strong 02:30 ET candle that opened at 48.06 and closed at 48.54. Support levels appear to have formed around the 48.36–48.50 range, with resistance at 49.0 and 49.33. A potential bullish harami formed at 09:15 ET, suggesting caution for further bearish moves.

Moving Averages

On the 15-minute timeframe, the 20-period and 50-period EMAs crossed multiple times, with the 20 EMA dipping below the 50 EMA during the bearish phase, signaling a temporary bearish bias. By the end of the session, the 20 EMA had reascended, hinting at a possible reversal. On the daily chart, the 50 and 200 EMA lines were closely aligned, suggesting the pair remains in a neutral consolidation phase with no clear long-term bias.

MACD & RSI

MACD turned bearish during the 19:30–22:00 ET period, with a bearish crossover and negative momentum. However, a positive divergence formed in the final hours of the session as the histogram turned upward. RSI dropped into oversold territory at 48.28 before rebounding, indicating potential short-term buying interest. A moderate overbought condition was seen around 49.78 during the mid-session bearish move.

Bollinger Bands

Price action exhibited a clear volatility expansion in the early hours, with price moving outside the lower band at 19:30 ET. A subsequent contraction followed until late morning, when price retested the lower band multiple times between 02:00–06:00 ET. By midday, price settled within the bands, indicating a return to more normalized volatility levels. The 20-period Bollinger Bands remained relatively stable, with no signs of a breakout forming.

Volume & Turnover

Volume spiked sharply during the 19:30 ET bearish candle (26,884.6) and again at 02:30 ET (26,920.0), confirming the bearish and bullish moves, respectively. Notional turnover mirrored this, with the largest turnover occurring between 19:30–20:45 ET. A divergence occurred between 09:15–10:00 ET where price moved higher but volume remained low, suggesting limited conviction behind the rally.

Fibonacci Retracements

Key 15-minute retracement levels were tested during the session, with price finding support at the 61.8% level (48.54) and resistance at the 38.2% level (48.94) after the 19:30 ET drop. On the daily chart, the 50% Fibonacci retracement of the recent decline was near 48.78, which coincided with a bounce observed around 03:00–04:00 ET.

Backtest Hypothesis

The attempted backtesting for the “Bullish Engulfing” pattern on XLMJPY encountered technical issues, likely due to the symbol being either catalogued differently or not available in USD/JPY format. A logical workaround would be to use XLMUSD for pattern recognition, as USD data is more readily available. Alternatively, a synthetic XLMJPY series could be constructed using XLMUSD and USDJPY cross-rate data. Both approaches allow for a viable path forward in testing candlestick strategies. This reinforces the need for standardized symbol usage and cross-rate calculations in multi-currency crypto pairs.

Decoding market patterns and unlocking profitable trading strategies in the crypto space

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.