Market Overview for Siacoin/Ethereum (SCETH)
Generated by AI AgentAinvest Crypto Technical Radar
Sunday, Sep 21, 2025 4:13 pm ET2min read
ETH--
Aime Summary
Siacoin/Ethereum (SCETH) opened at 6.5e-07 on 2025-09-20 at 12:00 ET, reached a high and low of 6.5e-07, and closed at the same level at 12:00 ET on 2025-09-21. Total volume for the 24-hour period was approximately 1,499,511.0 SCETH, with a notional turnover of roughly 0.9443815 ETH.
The price action was largely non-eventful, with no significant support or resistance levels observed. All candles were flat, forming a tight, lateral consolidation pattern with no visible candlestick formations such as doji, hammers, or engulfing patterns. The price has been unable to break out of a narrow band, suggesting a high degree of indecision among market participants.
On the 15-minute chart, the 20- and 50-period moving averages are tightly aligned with the price, reinforcing the sideways trading range. The 50-period line shows no discernible upward or downward bias, while the 20-period line closely tracks price. On the daily timeframe, the 50- and 200-period moving averages are expected to be similarly aligned, with the 100-period line likely overlapping both due to the flat price movement.
The MACD line and signal line remained flat near zero throughout the period, indicating no momentum in either direction. The histogram showed no expansion or contraction, further supporting the notion of consolidation. The RSI hovered around the 50 level, showing neither overbought nor oversold conditions. This suggests the market is in equilibrium and lacks directional energy.
Volatility was extremely low, with Bollinger Bands compressed to a narrow range. The price remained near the midline of the bands for the duration, with no significant expansions or contractions observed. This indicates a period of low volatility and likely a continuation of consolidation before any breakout may occur.
Volume remained near zero for the majority of the 24-hour period, with only two spikes at 1945 and 0730 ET. These spikes were not accompanied by any meaningful price movement and may represent automated trading or minor market corrections. Notional turnover mirrored the volume pattern, with no divergence between the two metrics, suggesting no significant institutional activity or large market orders.
Applying Fibonacci retracement levels to the recent 15-minute swing and the broader daily range also showed no meaningful action. The price remained flat at 6.5e-07, with no indication of reaching key retracement levels such as 38.2% or 61.8%. This suggests the price is not responding to Fibonacci levels, reinforcing the idea of a consolidation phase.
The flat and consolidation-bound nature of SCETH suggests that a mean-reversion strategy could be tested in this environment. A potential approach might involve buying on small pullbacks to key Fibonacci levels or the lower Bollinger Band while using the 20-period moving average as a dynamic support. A stop-loss could be placed slightly below the daily low to manage risk. Given the low volatility, such a strategy would need to account for slippage and transaction costs, particularly if executed on smaller exchanges where liquidity is tighter.
• • •
• Price remained tightly range-bound at 6.5e-07 with no directional bias evident in the last 24 hours.
• Volume was negligible for most of the period, with only two notable spikes at 1945 and 0730 ET.
• No candlestick patterns emerged; all candles were flat with no shadowing.
• RSI and MACD showed no momentum, indicating a consolidation phase.
• Volatility was minimal, with BollingerBINI-- Bands compressed and price near the midline.
Opening and Closing Summary
Siacoin/Ethereum (SCETH) opened at 6.5e-07 on 2025-09-20 at 12:00 ET, reached a high and low of 6.5e-07, and closed at the same level at 12:00 ET on 2025-09-21. Total volume for the 24-hour period was approximately 1,499,511.0 SCETH, with a notional turnover of roughly 0.9443815 ETH.
Structure & Formations
The price action was largely non-eventful, with no significant support or resistance levels observed. All candles were flat, forming a tight, lateral consolidation pattern with no visible candlestick formations such as doji, hammers, or engulfing patterns. The price has been unable to break out of a narrow band, suggesting a high degree of indecision among market participants.
Moving Averages
On the 15-minute chart, the 20- and 50-period moving averages are tightly aligned with the price, reinforcing the sideways trading range. The 50-period line shows no discernible upward or downward bias, while the 20-period line closely tracks price. On the daily timeframe, the 50- and 200-period moving averages are expected to be similarly aligned, with the 100-period line likely overlapping both due to the flat price movement.
MACD & RSI
The MACD line and signal line remained flat near zero throughout the period, indicating no momentum in either direction. The histogram showed no expansion or contraction, further supporting the notion of consolidation. The RSI hovered around the 50 level, showing neither overbought nor oversold conditions. This suggests the market is in equilibrium and lacks directional energy.
Bollinger Bands
Volatility was extremely low, with Bollinger Bands compressed to a narrow range. The price remained near the midline of the bands for the duration, with no significant expansions or contractions observed. This indicates a period of low volatility and likely a continuation of consolidation before any breakout may occur.
Volume & Turnover
Volume remained near zero for the majority of the 24-hour period, with only two spikes at 1945 and 0730 ET. These spikes were not accompanied by any meaningful price movement and may represent automated trading or minor market corrections. Notional turnover mirrored the volume pattern, with no divergence between the two metrics, suggesting no significant institutional activity or large market orders.
Fibonacci Retracements
Applying Fibonacci retracement levels to the recent 15-minute swing and the broader daily range also showed no meaningful action. The price remained flat at 6.5e-07, with no indication of reaching key retracement levels such as 38.2% or 61.8%. This suggests the price is not responding to Fibonacci levels, reinforcing the idea of a consolidation phase.
Backtest Hypothesis
The flat and consolidation-bound nature of SCETH suggests that a mean-reversion strategy could be tested in this environment. A potential approach might involve buying on small pullbacks to key Fibonacci levels or the lower Bollinger Band while using the 20-period moving average as a dynamic support. A stop-loss could be placed slightly below the daily low to manage risk. Given the low volatility, such a strategy would need to account for slippage and transaction costs, particularly if executed on smaller exchanges where liquidity is tighter.
Decoding market patterns and unlocking profitable trading strategies in the crypto space
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue



Comments
No comments yet