Market Overview for Request/Bitcoin (REQBTC) – January 11, 2026

Sunday, Jan 11, 2026 5:38 am ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- REQBTC traded in a tight 1.16e-06 to 1.17e-06 range with minimal volume and no directional bias.

- Technical indicators (RSI, MACD) showed neutrality, with no overbought/oversold signals or candlestick patterns.

- Low volatility and liquidity suggest continued consolidation, but potential breakout risks persist amid thin trading activity.

Summary
• Price remained tightly range-bound near 1.16e-06 with no directional bias.
• Volume activity was minimal, concentrated in four 5-minute intervals.
• No significant candlestick patterns or momentum shifts emerged.
• RSI and MACD showed no divergence or overbought/oversold signals.

At 12:00 ET–1, Request/Bitcoin (REQBTC) opened at 1.16e-06, reached a high of 1.17e-06, and closed at 1.16e-06 with a low of 1.16e-06. Total 24-hour volume was 5,933.0, and turnover was 0.00692976.

Price Structure and Key Levels


The price remained flat within a narrow range between 1.16e-06 and 1.17e-06. No bearish or bullish candlestick formations were identified during the 24-hour window, and no clear support or resistance levels were broken.

Moving Averages and Momentum


Short-term moving averages (20/50) and long-term averages (50/100/200) remained stable with no directional deviation. MACD and RSI remained neutral, with no overbought or oversold signals emerging.

Volatility and Volume


Volatility was exceptionally low, with no meaningful expansion or contraction in Bollinger Bands. Price did not deviate significantly from the mid-band. Volume activity was minimal, with occasional spikes in the middle of the window but without any corresponding price movement.

Fibonacci Retracements


Fibonacci levels drawn from recent 5-minute swings showed no meaningful interaction with price, as the market remained directionless and lacked conviction. Daily Fibonacci levels also showed no engagement.

Over the next 24 hours, the lack of volume and momentum may suggest a continuation of range-bound behavior, but a breakout attempt could emerge if larger participants step in. Investors should remain cautious for false breakouts amid thin liquidity and low turnover.