Market Overview for Pepe/Yen (PEPEJPY) - 2025-11-08

Generated by AI AgentTradeCipherReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Saturday, Nov 8, 2025 11:15 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- PEPEJPY peaked at 0.000977 before consolidating near 0.000943, showing bearish divergence after a failed high.

- High volume during 18:00–21:00 ET and a failed bullish engulfing pattern indicated indecision and exhaustion.

- MACD and RSI signals suggested weakening momentum, with key support at 0.000942 critical for near-term stability.

Summary
• Price climbed to 0.000977 before consolidating near 0.00095 in the final hours.
• High volume and turnover were seen during the 18:00–21:00 ET window.
• Strong bearish divergence appeared after a failed 0.000967 high.

Pepe/Yen (PEPEJPY) opened at 0.000908 on 2025-11-07 and closed at 0.000943 on 2025-11-08. The 24-hour range was between 0.000903 and 0.000977, with a total volume of 6,901,968,505.0 and a turnover of approximately $6,274,532.

Structure & Formations


Price action displayed clear resistance near 0.000967 and a strong support level at 0.000942. A bullish engulfing pattern was noted in the 21:15–21:30 ET window, but it failed to hold. A doji appeared at 0.000957 during the final hours of the Asian session, indicating indecision.

Moving Averages


On the 15-minute chart, the 20-period MA crossed above the 50-period MA, suggesting short-term bullish . However, the 50-period MA crossed below the 100-period MA on the daily chart, signaling bearish pressure.

MACD & RSI


MACD showed a positive crossover during the 18:30–19:00 ET window, but the histogram began to flatten after the 0.000967 high. RSI reached overbought levels above 70 for several hours but then declined sharply, indicating weakening momentum.

Bollinger Bands


Price remained within the Bollinger Band envelope throughout the 24-hour period, with a contraction observed between 0.00095 and 0.000957. This suggests a potential breakout scenario, although the recent pullback has kept volatility in check.

Volume & Turnover


Volume spiked to 299 million at 21:30 ET, coinciding with a failed breakout above 0.000972. Notional turnover also peaked during this period, but the lack of follow-through suggested exhaustion rather than strength. A divergence between volume and price emerged after 00:00 ET on 2025-11-08, indicating bearish pressure.

Fibonacci Retracements


The 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level of the recent 0.000903–0.000977 move was at 0.000952, which PEPEJPY tested but failed to hold. The 38.2% level at 0.000946 appears to be a critical support.

Backtest Hypothesis


To run the back-test accurately, I’ll need to pin down two points:
1. Which stock (or list of stocks) would you like to test? • If you’d like to test a broad market proxy, I can default to something like SPY (S&P 500 ETF), but please let me know your preference.
2. Just to confirm the trade rules: • A “MACD Death Cross” is normally when the MACD line crosses below its signal line – this is usually considered bearish. • Yet you also say “sell when MACD crosses below the signal line,” which would be the same point in time. Do you instead mean: – Buy when MACD crosses above its signal line (often called a Golden Cross), and – Sell when MACD crosses below the signal line (Death Cross)? Once I have confirmation on the ticker(s) and the exact entry/exit conditions, I can pull the MACD data and run the back-test from 2022-01-01 to today.

Given the current consolidation near 0.000943, a break below 0.000935 may open the door for a test of 0.000923–0.000925. Conversely, a retest of 0.000952 could trigger a short-term bounce, but confirmation above 0.000961 is needed to rekindle bullish momentum.

Traders should remain cautious, as volume divergence and bearish RSI action suggest a potential near-term reversal. The key for the next 24 hours will be whether 0.000942 holds or breaks, which could either stabilize the pair or trigger a deeper correction.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet