Summary
• Price declined from 6.1e-06 to 6.06e-06, with a low of 6.01e-06 at 00:15 ET.
• High volatility driven by sharp intraday swings and strong volume surges post-midnight.
• Divergence between price and volume highlights potential exhaustion in short-term
.
The 24-hour chart for Pepe/Tether (PEPEUSDT) opened at 6.1e-06 and closed at 6.06e-06, with a high of 6.26e-06 and a low of 6.01e-06. Total traded volume was approximately 1.489 trillion units, and notional turnover amounted to $9.03 million. The price action showed a bearish bias with significant intraday swings and a sharp decline after 00:15 ET, where a low of 6.01e-06 was briefly touched. The volume increased significantly during the overnight hours, particularly around the 00:15–02:00 ET timeframe.
Structure & Formations
Price formed a bearish
engulfing pattern at 19:30–20:00 ET, signaling a shift from bullish to bearish sentiment. A key
support level was identified around
6.05e-06, where price bounced slightly after multiple tests. On the 15-minute chart, a
doji at 00:15 ET suggested indecision and could mark a potential reversal point. Resistance levels are currently forming around
6.12e-06 to 6.14e-06, where the price showed failed attempts to push higher earlier in the session.
Moving Averages
The
15-minute chart shows the
20-period SMA crossing below the
50-period SMA, indicating a short-term bearish bias. On the
daily chart, the
50-period SMA is above the
200-period SMA, suggesting a longer-term bullish trend that has yet to be validated by sustained price action above 6.2e-06. This divergence between short and long timeframes implies that traders may be positioning for a test of key support levels.
MACD & RSI
The
MACD line turned negative during the overnight session and showed bearish divergence with price, as the indicator hit a lower high while price failed to do the same. The
RSI dropped below 30 multiple times, indicating
oversold conditions, but price failed to rebound meaningfully, signaling possible bearish exhaustion. However, a
MACD crossover on 04:15–04:30 ET showed a brief bullish attempt, though it was quickly negated.
Bollinger Bands
The price tested the
lower Bollinger Band at
6.01e-06, suggesting a period of
volatility contraction followed by a sharp expansion during the overnight session. The
width of the bands increased significantly during the 00:15–02:00 ET window, aligning with the volume surge and sharp price drop. As of the 12:00 ET close, the price was within the band but closer to the lower bound, indicating a heightened risk of a bounce or breakdown.
Volume & Turnover
Volume spiked dramatically during the
00:15–02:00 ET window, with the
23:15–00:15 ET candle alone contributing
230 billion units in volume. Notional turnover reached a
24-hour peak of $1.55 million at 01:45 ET. Price and turnover aligned during the morning hours, confirming the bearish bias. However,
divergence appeared after 06:00 ET, with volume slowing despite continued price weakness, hinting at potential bearish exhaustion.
Fibonacci Retracements
On the
15-minute chart, the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level at
6.10e-06 acted as a
strong resistance after the initial rally from 6.06e-06. On the
daily chart, the 38.2% retracement level at
6.15e-06 failed to hold, and the price pushed below the
61.8% level at 6.12e-06, indicating a strong bearish bias. These levels may continue to act as key resistance and support for the next 24 hours.
Backtest Hypothesis
The backtest results reveal a
highly negative performance for the "Golden Cross" MACD-based strategy, with a
total return of -76.7% and an
annualized return of -16.3% from 2022 to 2025. The
Sharpe Ratio of -0.23 and
max drawdown of 79.85% highlight the strategy’s high risk and poor risk-adjusted returns. These results align with the observed
bearish momentum and MACD divergence, suggesting that traditional bullish strategies may underperform in the current environment. The backtest also assumed a
14-day hold without stop-loss or take-profit, which may have exacerbated losses during bearish periods.
Comments
No comments yet