Market Overview for Harvest Finance/Tether (FARMUSDT)

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Crypto Technical Radar
Saturday, Sep 20, 2025 3:19 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- FARMUSDT traded between $27.54-$28.35, forming bullish engulfing and failed bearish reversal patterns near key support/resistance levels.

- A 5:15-5:30 AM ET volume spike confirmed a $27.82-$27.90 breakout, but diverging turnover raised liquidity concerns in upper ranges.

- RSI hit overbought 74 during the rally, while Bollinger Bands expanded (SD 0.05→0.20) before late-day consolidation signaled potential exhaustion.

- 38.2% Fibonacci (27.73) provided support, with 61.8% level (28.02) showing resistance, suggesting possible pullbacks toward 27.85-27.90 consolidation zones.

• Price opened at $27.72 and closed at $27.77 with a high of $28.35 and a low of $27.54.
• Volatility expanded mid-day, with

Bands widening during a sharp rally.
• RSI signaled overbought conditions in the afternoon before reversing lower.
• Volume surged during the 5:15–5:30 AM ET spike, confirming a bullish breakout.
• A bullish engulfing pattern formed near $27.65, followed by a failed bearish reversal at $28.35.

Overview and Key Metrics

Harvest Finance/Tether (FARMUSDT) opened at $27.72 on 2025-09-19 12:00 ET and closed at $27.77 on 2025-09-20 12:00 ET. The 24-hour high was $28.35, while the low was $27.54. Total volume was 4,129.447 units, and notional turnover (amount) reached 1,028. Total volatility and price swings suggest mixed sentiment during the session, with a late-day rally pushing the pair to overbought levels before a consolidation phase.

Structure & Formations

Price action revealed key support at $27.65 and resistance at $27.90 on the 15-minute chart. A strong bullish engulfing pattern formed near $27.65, followed by a bearish reversal at the high of $28.35, suggesting exhaustion. A doji formed near $28.05, signaling indecision after a sharp rally. The 50-period moving average on the 15-minute chart crossed above the 20-period line around $27.75, suggesting a short-term bullish bias.

Moving Averages and MACD

The 20-period moving average (15-min) ended at approximately $27.79, while the 50-period line was at $27.74, suggesting a potential upward bias. MACD showed a bullish crossover at 5:30 AM ET before diverging with price in the late morning. RSI reached overbought territory at 74 during the rally, then dipped to 56 by 12:00 ET, indicating weakening momentum.

Bollinger Bands and Volatility

Bollinger Bands expanded significantly between 5:15–6:00 AM ET, with a standard deviation increase from 0.05 to 0.20. Price spent the majority of the day between the 61.8% and 38.2% retracement levels of the 27.54–28.35 range. A late-day break above the upper band confirmed a potential bullish reversal, but volatility began to contract by the close, hinting at a possible consolidation phase.

Volume and Turnover

Volume spiked sharply at 5:15–5:30 AM ET, with a total of 4,758.911 units traded—nearly double the average. This coincided with a strong rally from $27.82 to $27.90, suggesting strong buyer participation. However, turnover did not follow suit proportionally, raising concerns about depth in the upper end of the range. A divergence in the afternoon between price and volume also appeared, signaling weakening conviction in the bullish move.

Fibonacci Retracements

Using the 27.54–28.35 range, key Fibonacci levels at 27.73 (38.2%) and 28.02 (61.8%) were tested multiple times. The 38.2% level acted as a minor support area, while the 61.8% level showed resistance. A potential pullback from 28.35 could target the 27.90–27.85 zone, where earlier candlestick formations suggest potential for a reversal or consolidation.

Backtest Hypothesis

A possible backtesting strategy could focus on entries after a bullish engulfing pattern forms near key Fibonacci support levels, with a stop-loss just below the pattern's low. The recent move from 27.65 to 28.35 provides a high-probability setup for such a strategy, especially when confirmed by a MACD crossover and rising volume. Testing this on historical 15-minute data from similar volatility environments could reveal its robustness.