Summary• Price action was range-bound, with a high of $0.00000088 and low of $0.00000081.• RSI and MACD showed muted
with no clear overbought or oversold bias.• Volume remained elevated after 20:00 ET, suggesting potential consolidation or breakout酝酿.
Dusk/Bitcoin (DUSKBTC) opened at $0.00000088 on 2025-11-07 at 12:00 ET and closed at $0.00000084 on 2025-11-08 at 12:00 ET, with a high of $0.00000088 and a low of $0.00000081. Total volume over the 24-hour window was 1,128,290.0, with a total turnover (notional value) of approximately $0.933 (based on average price).
The price remained within a tight $0.00000081–$0.00000088 range over the 24-hour period. Key support levels are forming near $0.00000081–$0.00000082, while resistance is observed at $0.00000086–$0.00000088. A few bullish and bearish engulfing patterns were visible during the late hours of the day, indicating short-term indecision. Doji stars were not identified due to incomplete pattern recognition data, but the formation of several long lower wicks suggests bearish caution in the near term.
Structure & Formations
Price remained largely within a defined channel throughout the day, with a few short-lived breakouts failing to maintain momentum. A key bearish engulfing pattern appeared around 19:30 ET, while a potential bullish reversal could be forming near $0.00000082 as buyers stepped in during the 00:00–03:00 ET timeframe. The consolidation near $0.00000084–$0.00000085 could suggest a potential breakout酝酿 in the coming hours.
Moving Averages
On the 15-minute chart, the 20-period and 50-period moving averages were nearly aligned, reflecting a sideways market. On the daily chart, the 50-day average sits slightly above the 200-day average, indicating a neutral to mildly bullish longer-term bias. The price closed just below the 50-day moving average, suggesting a continuation of consolidation is likely for now.
MACD & RSI
The MACD histogram showed a flat profile with no clear divergence, while the RSI hovered near the 50 level, indicating neutral momentum. No overbought or oversold readings were observed, and the market appears to be in a phase of consolidation rather than trend formation. Divergence between price and momentum indicators was not noted, but the RSI’s inability to break above 60 suggests a lack of strong upward bias.
Bollinger Bands
Price remained within the Bollinger Band envelope for most of the 24 hours, with a brief expansion observed around 20:00 ET. The bands have been narrowing slightly, indicating lower volatility. The closing price at $0.00000084 is near the middle band, suggesting no clear bias in either direction and reinforcing a continuation of the range-bound scenario.
Volume & Turnover
Volume spiked significantly around 20:15 ET and again between 00:00–02:00 ET, with the highest notional turnover observed near $0.00000086. However, price failed to close above key resistance levels, indicating potential bearish absorption. Divergence between higher volume and lower price action could be a signal of exhaustion, especially at the upper end of the range.
Fibonacci Retracements
Fibonacci retracement levels derived from the recent $0.00000081–$0.00000088 swing suggest key support at the 61.8% level near $0.00000083 and resistance at 38.2% around $0.00000086. The price closed near the 50% retracement level, suggesting further consolidation is likely before a directional move is attempted.
Backtest Hypothesis
Efforts to identify Doji Star patterns for DUSKBTC were hindered by the unavailability of the correct ticker symbol in the data source. Doji stars are often used as potential reversal signals in trend-following or counter-trend strategies. A typical backtest might involve entering a position at the close of a Doji Star and holding for three days. Given the lack of clear Doji Star signals today and the current range-bound environment, the efficacy of such a strategy would depend on having a properly identified signal base. Once the correct symbol or pattern data is confirmed, a comprehensive event-driven backtest can be conducted to assess performance from 2022–2025.
Comments
No comments yet