Summary
• Price formed key support at ¥261.3 and tested resistance near ¥269.9 with no clear breakout.
• Momentum shifted back and forth, with RSI hovering near neutral and no clear overbought/oversold conditions.
• Volume surged during ¥261.3–262.2 recovery and ¥266.5–269.9 rally, confirming price action.
• Volatility expanded after ¥261.4 low, with price trading within upper and lower Bollinger Band boundaries.
• No strong 5-min candlestick patterns emerged, but a bullish engulfing pattern briefly appeared post-¥261.4.
APTJPY opened at ¥266.1 on 2025-12-29 at 12:00 ET, reached a high of ¥271.1, a low of ¥261.3, and closed at ¥266.9 on 2025-12-30 at 12:00 ET. Total volume was 17,749.5 and turnover was ¥4,860,000. Price action was volatile, with multiple range-bound and breakout attempts.
Structure & Formations
Price found firm support near ¥261.3–261.4 and tested ¥269.9 as a key resistance. A small bullish engulfing pattern emerged after the ¥261.4 low, suggesting a short-term reversal attempt. No strong doji or bearish patterns were evident.
Moving Averages
On the 5-minute chart, the 20-EMA and 50-EMA showed a cross near ¥263.9, indicating a potential short-term shift in bias. Daily averages would need updated data for broader context.
Momentum and Volatility
RSI moved between 35–65 during the period, showing balanced momentum with no strong overbought or oversold signals. Bollinger Bands widened after the ¥261.4 low, reflecting increased volatility. Price spent time in the upper and lower bands, showing active range trading.
Volume and Turnover
Volume surged during key moves: ¥261.3–262.2 and ¥266.5–269.9, aligning with price direction. Turnover spiked during these moves, supporting the volume narrative and confirming bullish and bearish swings.
Forward-Looking Perspective
Price may test ¥269.9 resistance again, with a potential breakout or consolidation expected. A failure to clear ¥269.9 could trigger a pullback toward ¥261.3–261.4. Investors should monitor volume and RSI for confirmation of any directional bias.
Comments
No comments yet