The Macro Repricing Crisis: Why Crypto and Equities Are Synchronized in a Global De-Risking Trade

Generated by AI AgentRiley SerkinReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Tuesday, Nov 18, 2025 11:25 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Global macroeconomic stress and leverage unwinds have synchronized crypto and equity markets, with

and correlations rising to 0.5+ since 2020.

- 2025's $19-20B crypto deleveraging event, triggered by trade war fears and liquidity crunches, mirrored equity market unwinds like September's $1.5B long liquidation.

- Geopolitical tensions (e.g., U.S. election uncertainty) and regulatory shifts amplified volatility, with Bitcoin's 4.5% drop coinciding with 13% selloffs in speculative sectors.

- Investors now prioritize macro-aware portfolios, favoring Bitcoin over altcoins and defensive equities as leverage-driven risks reshape diversification strategies.

- The 2023-2025 macro repricing crisis has made cross-asset correlation systemic, requiring synchronized risk management in leveraged, liquidity-sensitive global markets.

The global financial system is undergoing a seismic shift as macroeconomic stress, leverage unwinds, and synchronized risk-off dynamics reshape cross-asset correlations. Cryptocurrencies and equities-once seen as distinct asset classes-now exhibit strikingly aligned behavior during periods of systemic uncertainty. This synchronization reflects a broader "global de-risking trade," where investors flee speculative exposure amid tightening monetary policy, geopolitical volatility, and liquidity crunches.

The Evolving Correlation Between and Equities

Bitcoin's relationship with traditional markets has transformed dramatically since 2020. Initially non-correlated, the asset now moves in lockstep with the S&P 500 during macroeconomic stress, with rolling correlations reaching 0.5 in 2020 and

. This alignment is not coincidental. Bitcoin has become an "amplified" version of equities, magnifying gains and losses. For instance, in 2024, the S&P 500 rose 24% while Bitcoin surged 135%, whereas in 2022, both assets fell sharply, albeit more so for Bitcoin .

The structural drivers behind this shift are clear. Institutional adoption, facilitated by ETFs, has embedded Bitcoin into traditional portfolio allocations, while macroeconomic factors-such as interest rate expectations and dollar strength-now influence both asset classes simultaneously

. As Donoius (2025) notes, the TVP-VAR model reveals a cyclical pattern: Bitcoin's correlation with equities post-ETF approval, underscoring the role of institutional infrastructure in reshaping market dynamics.

Leverage Unwinds: The Catalyst for Synchronized Risk-Off

The most dramatic example of this synchronization emerged in October 2025, when

in leveraged positions across crypto markets. Bitcoin's perpetual open interest plummeted by 18.6% in a single week, driven by a perfect storm of trade war fears (e.g., Trump's proposed 100% tariffs on Chinese imports), liquidity crunches, and technical breakdowns in price structure . This deleveraging was not isolated to crypto: equity markets experienced parallel unwinds, as seen in September 2025's "Red Monday," when of leveraged longs triggered a 46% spike in futures setups.

The mechanics of these unwinds are interconnected. Rising Treasury yields and a stronger dollar-both hallmarks of macroeconomic tightening-eroded risk appetite across asset classes. In crypto, this manifested as a 74% share of liquidations targeting long positions, while equity markets saw similar cascading losses in leveraged retail and institutional portfolios

. The result was a self-reinforcing cycle: falling prices triggered margin calls, which accelerated selling, further depressing liquidity and deepening losses.

The Role of Geopolitical and Regulatory Shocks

Geopolitical tensions and regulatory shifts have amplified these dynamics. The U.S. election cycle, with its implications for trade and fiscal policy, introduced additional uncertainty, while

for institutional capital. However, these same factors also heightened volatility. For example, in late 2025, Bitcoin's 4.5% drop coincided with a 13% selloff in speculative sectors like AI and DePIN, as investors prioritized cash over exposure .

Emerging markets further illustrate the global reach of this de-risking trade. India's September 2025 equity slump, marked by a manufacturing PMI drop to 57.7 and high leverage imbalances,

. The Reserve Bank of India's cautious stance on rate cuts highlighted the fragility of leveraged positions in both asset classes, as macroeconomic imbalances spread from developed to emerging markets.

Implications for Investors: A New Era of Macro-Aware Portfolios

The synchronization of crypto and equities demands a recalibration of investment strategies. Traditional diversification assumptions no longer hold: in a risk-off environment, both asset classes now act as conduits for systemic shocks. Investors must prioritize macro-aware positioning, hedging against leverage-driven volatility and liquidity risks.

For crypto, this means favoring assets with strong fundamentals over speculative altcoins, as seen in the October 2025 flight to Bitcoin amid

and Solana's deeper losses . In equities, defensive sectors and cash equivalents will gain relative value as leverage unwinds persist. Meanwhile, regulatory developments-such as the maturation of crypto ETFs-will likely stabilize markets in the long term, but short-term volatility remains a given.

Conclusion

The macro repricing crisis of 2023–2025 has redefined the relationship between crypto and equities. What was once a niche correlation has become a systemic feature of global markets, driven by leverage, liquidity, and macroeconomic forces. As investors navigate this new landscape, the key takeaway is clear: in a world of synchronized risk-off dynamics, cross-asset macro awareness is no longer optional-it is essential.