Lyft's 13.13% Surge Drives $2.31 Billion Volume, 350.77% Increase, 38th in U.S. Trading Activity

On September 17, 2025, , . equities by trading activity. The stock’s performance was driven by strategic adjustments in its ride-sharing operations and renewed investor confidence in its cost-cutting initiatives.

Recent developments highlighted Lyft’s focus on optimizing operational efficiency, including the consolidation of underperforming routes and renegotiation of driver incentives. Analysts noted that these measures could stabilize margins amid ongoing macroeconomic pressures. Additionally, the company’s Q3 earnings guidance, though non-specific, suggested cautious optimism about Q4 demand trends in urban markets.

To run this back-test accurately I need to pin down a few practical details that aren’t fully specified yet: 1. Market universe • Do you want every U.S.–listed common stock, only S&P 500 constituents, or another universe? 2. Ranking rule • “Top 500” by what measure? (raw share volume, notional $ volume, or average vs. day-of-trade volume) • Should the ranking be based on today’s volume and the trade executed at the next day’s open, or both buy and sell at the same day’s close? 3. , or volume-weighted, or something else? 4. Trading frictions • Slippage/commissions assumptions, or ignore? 5. , but it cannot automatically scan the entire market and rank on every trading day. • Two work-arounds: a) You provide (or upload) a file that already lists, for each day, ; I can then run the P&L engine on those signals. b) We narrow the scope to a manageable, predefined universe (e.g., , . Let me know which route you prefer (and any answers to the questions above). Once I have that, I can generate the data-retrieval plan, , , and run the back-test.