Lucky Strike Entertainment's Q4 2025: Contradictions Emerge on Marketing Spend, Events Recovery, and Premium Product Focus
Generated by AI AgentAinvest Earnings Call Digest
Thursday, Aug 28, 2025 2:12 pm ET2min read
LUCK--
Aime Summary 
The above is the analysis of the conflicting points in this earnings call
Date of Call: August 28, 2025
Financials Results
- Revenue: $301.2M, up 6.1% YOY (vs $283.9M)
Guidance:
- FY26 revenue expected at $1.26B–$1.31B (+5–9% YOY).
- FY26 adjusted EBITDA targeted at $375M–$415M.
- Implied positive same-store comps of ~+1% to +5%.
- September quarter to show double-digit growth; Q4 revenue $10M–$20M above Q2.
- FY26 CapEx about $130M, focused on high-ROI projects.
- FY26 GAAP rent expense down ~$3M and capitalized lease expense down ~$21M from real estate buy.
- Marketing spend to increase by ~$10M–$15M within location operating costs.
Business Commentary:
* Revenue Growth and Organic Initiatives: - Lucky StrikeLUCK-- Entertainment reportedtotal revenue of $301.2 million for Q4 2025, growing 6.1% year-on-year. - The growth was driven by strong organic initiatives, including the successful summer season pass program and enhanced food and beverage offerings.- Season Pass Program Success:
- The summer season pass program generated
over $13.4 millionin pass revenue, more than double the previous year's$8.5 million. The growth was driven by increased marketing spend and employee engagement tools, which significantly improved membership numbers and guest visits.
Water Parks and FEC Acquisitions:
- The acquisition of two iconic water parks and several family entertainment centers expanded Lucky Strike's leadership in their respective verticals.
This expansion aims to build the premier location-based entertainment platform in North America, targeting water parks, FECs, and next-generation bowling concepts.
Food and Beverage Strategy:
- Lucky Strike's food and beverage offerings outperformed overall comps, with food revenue delivering positive
2.5%same-store comps. - This was achieved through innovative menu items, targeted marketing, and increased employee training, contributing to higher attachment rates and guest satisfaction.

Sentiment Analysis:
- Same-store sales improved sequentially each month and turned positive in July; July delivered double-digit total revenue growth YOY. Management guided FY26 revenue up 5–9% with adjusted EBITDA of $375M–$415M. They highlighted accretive real-estate acquisitions and successful season pass growth ($13.4M vs $8.5M prior year).
Q&A:
- Question from Jackson R. Gibb (Stifel): Why is FY26 EBITDA guidance seemingly conservative, and why resume guidance now?
Response: July was positive organically and double-digit total; guidance embeds higher marketing spend and newly acquired parks that lose money for three quarters before peak summer earnings, skewing gains to FY27.
- Question from Jackson R. Gibb (Stifel): How should FY26 quarterly cadence play out with water parks and events seasonality?
Response: Expect double-digit growth in the September quarter; Q4 revenue should be $10–$20M higher than Q2.
- Question from Randal J. Konik (Jefferies): When do events and California inflect?
Response: Comps ease from September; offline events improved and can be flat by late Sep/Oct as marketing ramps to capture share.
- Question from Randal J. Konik (Jefferies): How will you lift profitability in water parks/FECs versus bowling?
Response: Apply the same playbook: refresh assets, address deferred maintenance, add games, emphasize F&B and packaged pricing, and materially increase brand/marketing.
- Question from Randal J. Konik (Jefferies): What is the long-term portfolio mix by revenue?
Response: Roughly 40% bowling, 40% water parks, 20% FECs, with water parks scaling faster due to larger unit volumes.
- Question from Jason Ross Tilchen (Canaccord Genuity): Are increased marketing investments lifting comps, and how much spend is contemplated?
Response: $1M incremental spend drove season pass sales to $13.4M from $8.5M; marketing is moving toward ~2.5–3% of revenue from sub-1%.
- Question from Jason Ross Tilchen (Canaccord Genuity): Why file a shelf registration now?
Response: Housekeeping to access unsecured debt markets to repay the July bridge loan; intention is to tap debt, not equity.
- Question from Ian Alton Zaffino (Oppenheimer): Q4 monthly cadence and any regional weaknesses?
Response: Comps improved April -6%, May -3%, June -1%, July >+1%; weakness concentrated in California, while New York is comping positive.
- Question from Ian Alton Zaffino (Oppenheimer): Is alcohol softness a trade-down and how are you responding?
Response: Leaning into non-alcohol innovation (craft lemonadeLMND--, zero-proof) while refreshing cocktails; F&B outperformed comps and should benefit from the Lucky Strike rebrand.
- Question from Michael A. Kupinski (NOBLE Capital Markets): Trajectory for location operating costs and impact from Topgolf’s ad?
Response: Reported costs include a $21M noncash item; underlying ratios align with historical trends; the TopgolfMODG-- campaign had minimal impact—focus remains on core product and marketing.
- Question from Eric Owen Handler (ROTH Capital Partners): What comps are implied in the revenue guide and how is the Lucky Strike rebrand performing?
Response: Guide implies +1–5% comps; early rebrand results are encouraging with 55 conversions (100 by year-end), and California rebrands should provide lift.
- Question from Jeremy Scott Hamblin (Craig-Hallum Capital): FY26 cost structure and CapEx outlook?
Response: SG&A to track Q4 run-rate; marketing adds ~$10–$15M to location costs; Boomers/water parks run negative most of year but deliver high summer margins; non-acquisition CapEx ≈ $130M.
Descubre lo que los gerentes no quieren decir en llamadas de conferencia
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet