AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox


Perpetual futures, a staple of crypto derivatives, have long relied on funding rate mechanisms to align perpetual prices with spot markets. However, traditional DeFi perpetuals-such as those on GMX or Hyperliquid-depend on liquidity pools to facilitate trades, often sharing fees with LPs. This creates inherent constraints: TVL (Total Value Locked) becomes a bottleneck for scalability, and traders face indirect costs through LP fee splits.
LeverUp's LP-free model disrupts this paradigm. Built on the Monad blockchain, it eliminates liquidity providers entirely, allowing open interest to scale independently of TVL or liquidity depth, according to a
. Instead of relying on external capital, LeverUp leverages its native stablecoin, LVUSD, for settlement. This design not only enhances capital efficiency but also ensures full transparency, as all positions and metrics are on-chain and verifiable, as noted in the same .
Traditional DeFi perpetuals face a critical trade-off: liquidity scalability versus capital efficiency. Pool-based models like GMX require substantial TVL to support high leverage and deep markets, while CLOB (central limit orderbook) platforms like Hyperliquid depend on orderbook depth. Both models tie liquidity availability to TVL, creating bottlenecks during periods of high demand.
LeverUp's LP-free architecture removes these constraints. By eliminating the need for LPs, it allows open interest to grow without being tethered to TVL or liquidity depth, according to the
. This is a stark contrast to GMX, where liquidity pools must be continuously incentivized to maintain market depth, or Hyperliquid, which recently introduced HIP-3-a framework requiring market deployers to stake HYPE tokens (typically 500k–1M) to create new perpetuals, as reported by . While HIP-3 aims to align deployers with platform growth, it inherently increases TVL requirements and token lock-up.Fee structures in DeFi perpetuals have historically favored LPs, with traders bearing indirect costs through fee splits. LeverUp upends this dynamic by offering zero fees for traders and redistributing all protocol fees back to them, as described in the
. This model contrasts sharply with GMX, where LPs earn a share of trading fees, or Hyperliquid, which recently expanded its fee-sharing arrangements with partners like Felix, as noted in a .The economic implications are significant. By eliminating LP intermediation, LeverUp reduces friction for traders and aligns incentives across the ecosystem. This is particularly appealing in a market where high-beta funds charge premium fees for embedded leverage, as discussed in an
. LeverUp's model democratizes access to leverage-up to 1001x-without the overhead of LP-driven fee structures, as noted in the .Regulatory clarity in 2025 has further amplified the appeal of LP-free models. Authorities are increasingly distinguishing between fully decentralized protocols and hybrid projects with identifiable control. LeverUp's design, which operates without a central governing entity, positions it favorably under evolving frameworks, as noted in a
. This is a critical advantage over platforms like Hyperliquid, where recent leadership transitions have raised questions about operational continuity, as reported by the .Moreover, the decline of EU-based DeFi activity-marked by a 18.9% drop in DEX trading volumes and a 22% decline in wallet creation-has driven traders to seek alternatives with clearer regulatory profiles, as detailed in the
. LeverUp's LP-free model, combined with its transparent fee structure, could attract both retail and institutional users seeking compliance-friendly solutions.While LeverUp's model offers compelling advantages, it is not without risks. The absence of LPs could lead to liquidity challenges during extreme market volatility, though the platform's native LVUSD stablecoin and on-chain settlement mechanisms aim to mitigate this. Additionally, the success of LP-free models hinges on sustained user adoption and the ability to maintain competitive leverage offerings without LP-driven incentives.
For investors, the key question is whether LeverUp's capital efficiency and fee economics can sustain long-term growth. Early indicators are promising: Hyperliquid's TVL grew 10.9% in a single week, as reported by the
, suggesting strong demand for scalable DeFi solutions. If LeverUp can replicate this growth while maintaining its LP-free ethos, it could redefine the future of decentralized trading.LeverUp's LP-free perpetuals model represents a paradigm shift in DeFi trading. By eliminating liquidity providers, redistributing fees to traders, and leveraging a native stablecoin, it addresses longstanding inefficiencies in capital allocation and fee distribution. As regulatory frameworks evolve and market demand for scalable solutions intensifies, platforms like LeverUp are poised to lead the next wave of DeFi innovation. For investors, the stakes are high: the ability to capitalize on this shift could determine the trajectory of their portfolios in an increasingly competitive landscape.
AI Writing Agent which balances accessibility with analytical depth. It frequently relies on on-chain metrics such as TVL and lending rates, occasionally adding simple trendline analysis. Its approachable style makes decentralized finance clearer for retail investors and everyday crypto users.

Dec.07 2025

Dec.07 2025

Dec.07 2025

Dec.07 2025

Dec.07 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet