Lawsuit Alleges Binance Enabled Terrorist Crypto Transfers; Company Denies Claims

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byTianhao Xu
Tuesday, Nov 25, 2025 10:09 pm ET1min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- A North Dakota lawsuit accuses Binance and CZ Zhao of enabling $1B+ in crypto transactions linked to Hamas and Hezbollah post-2023 Israel attacks.

- The complaint alleges Binance failed to block illicit transfers despite a 2023 $4.3B money laundering penalty and insufficient compliance systems.

- Binance denies claims, citing compliance with sanctions, while victims seek triple damages under U.S. anti-terrorism laws.

- The case also links Binance to Venezuela gold smuggling and faces jurisdictional challenges in multiple states.

A federal lawsuit filed in North Dakota accuses Binance and its founder Changpeng "CZ" Zhao of facilitating over $1 billion in cryptocurrency transactions linked to U.S.-designated terrorist organizations, including Hamas and Hezbollah, in the wake of the October 7, 2023, attacks in Israel

. The 284-page complaint, brought by more than 300 victims and their families, alleges the crypto exchange knowingly enabled illicit transfers totaling $50 million post-attack and hundreds of millions prior .

The lawsuit, which cites the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, claims Binance's platform allowed terrorist groups to move funds with impunity despite a 2023 guilty plea and $4.3 billion penalty for prior money laundering violations

. Even after the settlement, the complaint alleges Binance continued to screen only outgoing transactions, enabling groups like Hamas's military wing to raise without scrutiny . The firm's compliance systems, it argues, remain insufficient to prevent such activity .

Zhao, who served four months in prison before being pardoned by President Donald Trump, stepped down as CEO in 2023 . The lawsuit also implicates senior executive Guangying Chen, who was not charged in the earlier case . Binance has denied the allegations, stating it complies with international sanctions laws and has "executed a wide-ranging transformation" of its compliance programs .

Legal battles over jurisdiction are ongoing. The North Dakota case hinges on two transactions traced to IP addresses in the state, while New York and Alabama courts also review similar claims

. In a prior ruling, New York Judge John Koeltl found plaintiffs had "alleged plausibly" that Binance "knowingly and substantially assisted" the attacks, though the company contested the decision .

The complaint further ties Binance to illegal gold smuggling networks in Venezuela, with a 26-year-old woman accused of handling $177 million in crypto for Hezbollah's gold operations

. U.S. enforcement agencies, including FinCEN, previously flagged Binance's failure to report Hamas-linked fundraising efforts .

As the case unfolds, victims seek triple damages under the Anti-Terrorism Act, which holds companies liable for "substantial assistance" in terrorist acts

. Binance's defense argues its services lack a "definable nexus" to terror activity and that plaintiffs failed to prove direct links to the attacks .