KXI vs. IYK: The Simple Math of Global Bread vs. Local Cash

Generated by AI AgentAlbert FoxReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Sunday, Jan 18, 2026 9:01 am ET3min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

focuses on U.S. with 54 stocks, $1.2B AUM, and 2.7% dividend yield, prioritizing domestic stability and income.

-

offers global diversification with 96 international stocks, 11.2% 1-year return, but lower 2.2% yield and higher 17.43% 5-year drawdown.

- IYK's U.S. concentration reduces currency risk but ties performance to domestic consumers, while KXI's global reach exposes it to foreign exchange volatility.

- Investors must choose between IYK's steady income from American brands or KXI's growth potential through international exposure and broader diversification.

When you buy one of these consumer staples ETFs, you're not just getting a basket of stocks. You're choosing between two different investment philosophies. Think of it as picking between a global grocery chain and a local supermarket.

The

, , is the U.S. supermarket. It focuses on the familiar giants at home, holding just 54 stocks. Its top holdings are household names like Procter & Gamble and Coca-Cola. This fund has a larger and offers a higher current payout, with a dividend yield of 2.7%. It's built for investors who want a steady income stream and comfort in domestic, proven brands.

The iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF,

, is the global grocery chain. It casts a wider net, holding nearly twice as many stocks-96 in total-across many countries. Its portfolio includes international powerhouses like Walmart and Philip Morris International, giving you exposure to global consumer trends. While its AUM is $908.7 million, it charges a nearly identical expense ratio of 0.39%, just a penny more than IYK's 0.38%.

The core trade-off is clear. KXI offers broader diversification and a slightly higher recent return, but it pays less in dividends. IYK offers a larger current income stream and a larger, more established fund size, but it's concentrated in the U.S. market. You're choosing between a wider selection of global staples and a bigger dividend check from familiar American brands.

The Numbers: Growth vs. Income in Plain English

The real test of any investment is how it performs. When you look at the numbers, the trade-off between growth and income becomes crystal clear.

Over the past year, the global grocery chain,

. That's a solid climb, more than double the 6.2% return for IYK. This suggests KXI's broader portfolio of international staples captured more growth during that period. In other words, the fund's global reach paid off in capital appreciation.

But that growth came with a bit more turbulence. Over the longer haul, KXI's value has dipped deeper during tough markets, with a five-year maximum drawdown of 17.43%. That's a bit worse than IYK's 15.04% drawdown. In simple terms, KXI's wider net means it's more exposed to volatility in different countries and currencies.

On the income side, the scales tip the other way. IYK offers a larger current payout, with a dividend yield of 2.7%. KXI's yield is lower at 2.2%. So if you're looking for a bigger check in your pocket right now, IYK provides it.

The bottom line is a classic choice. You can have the higher recent return and broader diversification of KXI, but you accept a bit more price swing and a smaller dividend. Or you can opt for IYK's steadier U.S. focus, a higher income stream, and slightly less volatility. The math is straightforward; the decision depends on whether you want growth or income to be your priority.

Risk, Diversification, and What to Watch

For investors in defensive sectors, the goal is often to smooth out the ride. That means looking past just returns and yields to understand the real risks and what could change the game.

KXI's broader global portfolio is its main risk buffer. By holding nearly twice as many stocks across many countries, it spreads the risk. If one region stumbles, gains elsewhere might offset it. This geographic diversification is a classic way to build a more stable rainy day fund. However, that wide net also exposes the fund to currency swings. When the dollar strengthens, the value of those foreign profits can shrink when converted back, acting as a headwind. The deeper five-year drawdown for KXI suggests this added complexity can lead to more volatility during global turbulence.

IYK, by contrast, leans on the stability of established U.S. giants. Its larger assets under management and higher current yield make it a natural choice for income-focused investors who value the predictable cash flow from household names. The fund's concentration in the domestic market means it's less exposed to foreign exchange risk, but it also means its fortunes are more tied to the health of the U.S. consumer.

So, what should you watch? For KXI, the key catalyst is currency. Fluctuations in the dollar's value will directly impact the fund's returns, often in ways that aren't immediately obvious from the stock prices alone. For IYK, the focus is on the domestic economy. Any significant shift in U.S. consumer spending power or retail sentiment could affect the dividend sustainability of its core holdings. The fund's higher yield is a promise of income, but that promise depends on the underlying companies maintaining their profits.

The bottom line is that both funds offer a defensive setup, but they hedge different risks. KXI's diversification is a shield against local storms, but it comes with a currency hedge. IYK's strength is its domestic focus and bigger dividend check, but it's more exposed to a single economy. The catalysts to watch are the forces that could break or strengthen those specific shields.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet