Kundra's 285 Bitcoins Expose Gaps in India's Crypto Enforcement


India’s Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed charges against Raj Kundra, a prominent businessman and husband of Bollywood actress Shilpa Shetty, in a $31 million cryptocurrency-related case. The agency alleges that Kundra illicitly held 285 BitcoinsBTC--, valued at ₹150.47 crore ($31 million), obtained from Amit Bhardwaj, the late mastermind of one of India’s largest crypto Ponzi schemes[1]. The chargesheet, submitted to a special court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), claims Kundra concealed evidence, including his BitcoinBTC-- wallet addresses, and engaged in property transactions with his wife at below-market rates to obscure the origin of the funds[2].
The case traces back to 2015–2018, when Bhardwaj, founder of GainBitcoin, orchestrated a fraudulent scheme promising high returns on Bitcoin mining. Over 8,000 investors were defrauded, with approximately 80,000 Bitcoins siphoned into hidden wallets[3]. According to the ED, Kundra was not merely a mediator but a direct beneficiary of the scheme. He received the Bitcoins to set up a mining farm in Ukraine, a project that never materialized. Despite repeated requests since 2018, Kundra has failed to disclose the wallet addresses or provide documentation verifying the transfers[4]. Investigators noted his precise recollection of receiving 285 Bitcoins in five tranches, contradicting his claim of acting as a middleman[5].
The ED’s allegations highlight systemic challenges in tracking and recovering crypto assets in India. Kundra’s case underscores the difficulty regulators face in liquidating frozen digital assets, which delay compensation for scam victims. Legal experts warn that unresolved high-profile frauds erode trust in cryptocurrencies, particularly among first-time investors[6]. Analysts emphasize the need for stricter compliance and disclosure standards to prevent similar exploitation of regulatory gaps[7].
The case also implicates Rajesh Satija, another businessman, as a co-accused. The ED’s chargesheet details Kundra’s alleged use of a “Term Sheet” agreement with Bhardwaj’s family, further entrenching his role in the scheme[3]. The agency’s findings have sparked broader concerns about investor sentiment in India’s crypto market. With asset recovery processes stalled, victims face prolonged uncertainty, and regulators risk losing credibility if enforcement mechanisms fail to adapt to the complexities of digital finance[8].
Kundra’s legal team has not commented publicly, and the case remains ongoing. If convicted, he could face prosecution and potential imprisonment. The outcome may serve as a critical test for India’s enforcement framework, determining whether it can effectively address crypto-related frauds while restoring investor confidence. For now, the case highlights the urgent need for policy reforms to address the vulnerabilities exposed by high-profile scams like GainBitcoin[9].
Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.



Comments
No comments yet