KeyCorp Climbs 0.43% on $550M Volume, Ranks 215th in Market Activity
On September 17, 2025, , , . The stock’s modest gain reflected selective investor interest amid broader market consolidation, though volume levels remained below average for the sector.
Recent developments suggest KeyCorp’s performance was influenced by a combination of sector-specific dynamics and operational clarity. Analysts noted that the regional bank’s , highlighted in recent regulatory filings, provided a degree of stability amid volatile market conditions. Additionally, a strategic partnership with a fintech firm, announced earlier in the month, signaled potential , reinforcing institutional confidence.
To run this back-test accurately I need to pin down a few practical details: 1. UniverseUPC-- definition • “Top 500 stocks by daily trading volume” can be drawn from many markets. • Should I screen the entire U.S. equity universe (NYSE + NASDAQ) each day, or a specific index such as the Russell 3000? 2. Ranking metric • Do you want to sort by dollar volume (shares × price) or by raw share volume? • Ties: equal-weight all names ranked ≤ 500? 3. Trade execution convention • Enter at today’s close and exit at tomorrow’s close (close-to-close return), or enter next day’s open and exit next day’s close (open-to-close return)? • Equal-weight portfolio re-balanced daily? 4. Practical note on tooling My current back-test engine evaluates one ticker at a time. To implement a daily-rebalanced 500-stock portfolio we’d need to approximate (e.g., construct a ) or split the calculation externally. – If an approximation is acceptable (for example, using an we rebalance monthly instead of daily), please let me know. – Otherwise, we may need to export data for offline processing. Let me know your preferred assumptions and whether an approximation is acceptable, and I’ll proceed immediately.

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments
No comments yet