JPMorgan Lowers Ardent Health Price Target to $15 from $18, Maintains Neutral Rating.
ByAinvest
Monday, Aug 11, 2025 3:43 pm ET1min read
ARDT--
Despite the earnings beat, JPMorgan cited higher Medicaid supplemental taxes as a reason for the downward revision. The firm reduced its adjusted EBITDA forecast for 2025 to $593 million from $597 million and applied a 4.6x multiple to the revised 2027 adjusted EBITDA estimate, leading to the lower price target [1].
Ardent Health Partners reported earnings per share of $0.52 for the second quarter, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.3 per share [2]. Revenue for the quarter reached $1.65 billion, up 11.9% year-over-year, demonstrating the company's robust financial health [2].
The stock has shown significant volatility, gaining 15.3% in the past week but losing 30.4% year-to-date. Investors should closely monitor management's commentary on the earnings call and future earnings expectations for a clearer picture of the stock's potential [2].
References:
[1] https://ca.investing.com/news/analyst-ratings/jpmorgan-lowers-ardent-health-partners-stock-price-target-to-15-on-medicaid-tax-impact-93CH-4149379
[2] https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/ardent-health-inc-ardt-q2-earnings-and-revenues-surpass-estimates
JPM--
JPMorgan has lowered its price target on Ardent Health to $15 from $18 and maintains a Neutral rating. The firm updated its model following the Q2 report.
JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM) has revised its price target for Ardent Health Partners Inc (NYSE:ARDT) to $15.00, down from $18.00, while maintaining a Neutral rating on the stock [1]. This adjustment comes after the company reported its second-quarter earnings, which exceeded estimates. The healthcare company benefited from the New Mexico Directed Payment Program (DPP) approval, which provided a $65 million EBITDA benefit in the quarter [1].Despite the earnings beat, JPMorgan cited higher Medicaid supplemental taxes as a reason for the downward revision. The firm reduced its adjusted EBITDA forecast for 2025 to $593 million from $597 million and applied a 4.6x multiple to the revised 2027 adjusted EBITDA estimate, leading to the lower price target [1].
Ardent Health Partners reported earnings per share of $0.52 for the second quarter, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.3 per share [2]. Revenue for the quarter reached $1.65 billion, up 11.9% year-over-year, demonstrating the company's robust financial health [2].
The stock has shown significant volatility, gaining 15.3% in the past week but losing 30.4% year-to-date. Investors should closely monitor management's commentary on the earnings call and future earnings expectations for a clearer picture of the stock's potential [2].
References:
[1] https://ca.investing.com/news/analyst-ratings/jpmorgan-lowers-ardent-health-partners-stock-price-target-to-15-on-medicaid-tax-impact-93CH-4149379
[2] https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/ardent-health-inc-ardt-q2-earnings-and-revenues-surpass-estimates

Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet