JPMorgan Accused of Political De-Banking; Denies Bias, Cites Compliance

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Tuesday, Nov 18, 2025 5:31 pm ET1min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Florida AG James Uthmeier probes

for alleged politically motivated "shadow de-banking" targeting conservative entities like .

- Investigation claims JPMorgan shared TMTG banking data with DOJ and closed accounts after a 2024 merger, citing a 2023 subpoena demanding pre-incorporation records.

- JPMorgan denies political bias, emphasizing compliance with legal requests while critics highlight lack of evidence and CFPB data showing minimal political bias in account closures.

- Probe overlaps with unrelated scrutiny over JPMorgan's ties to Epstein and Trump's calls for DOJ investigations into the bank's historical connections.

- Case highlights tensions between political figures and

, with critics framing the probe as part of broader politically driven regulatory actions.

The Florida attorney general has launched a probe into

, alleging the banking giant engaged in politically motivated "shadow de-banking" operations against conservative entities, including & Technology Group (TMTG). The investigation, announced by Republican Attorney General James Uthmeier, centers on claims that - a DOJ inquiry into the 2020 election's "fake electors" scheme - to suppress political adversaries.

Uthmeier accused JPMorgan of providing sensitive banking information to the DOJ without probable cause and terminating TMTG's accounts shortly after a March 2024 merger. "JPMC began questioning TMTG officials about transactions from years prior, insisting it was due diligence," he stated, adding that the timing of the account closures "raises obvious, troubling questions"

. The AG's office revealed a subpoena issued by the Biden-era DOJ on March 28, 2023, of TMTG, including data predating the company's incorporation.

JPMorgan has not directly addressed the allegations but emphasized its commitment to complying with legal requests. A spokesperson told The Daily Wire, "We have not debanked anyone because of political or religious relationships, period," while CEO Jamie Dimon noted in a January interview that "rules like the Bank Secrecy Act discourage banks from dealing with high-risk customers"

.

The probe has drawn scrutiny for its potential political motivations. Uthmeier, a Trump-endorsed candidate for reelection, framed the investigation as a response to "unsubstantiated claims" of systemic de-banking against conservatives. However,

shows that less than 1% of account closure complaints over 13 years cited political or religious bias. Critics argue the allegations lack evidence, that Trump's family business previously sued Capital One for alleged "political discrimination" without providing proof.

Separately, JPMorgan faces unrelated scrutiny over its historical ties to Jeffrey Epstein. In a separate but similarly contentious development, President Trump has called on the DOJ to investigate the bank's relationships with Epstein, Bill Clinton, and others.

for $365 million over its role in facilitating Epstein's sex trafficking operations but denied complicity in his crimes.

The Florida investigation underscores growing tensions between political figures and financial institutions. While Uthmeier insists the probe is about accountability, critics view it as part of a broader pattern of politically driven regulatory actions. As

, JPMorgan's defense of its legal compliance practices - and the broader debate over de-banking claims - will likely remain at the forefront of the national conversation. .

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet