JIVE Breaks Through to New 52-Week High at 69.6476: A Beacon for Value Investors

Tuesday, Oct 28, 2025 4:05 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- JPMorgan's JIVE.O ETF hits 52-week high driven by active global value strategies with ESG focus.

- Strong institutional demand shows $564K net flows from large orders, highlighting market confidence.

- 0.55% expense ratio contrasts with peers' sub-0.05% fees, but active management justifies differentiation.

- 52-week high breakout lacks technical confirmation but attracts momentum traders as key psychological level.

JPMorgan International Value ETF (JIVE.O) Hits 52-Week High Amid Strong Institutional Demand

The JPMorgan International Value ETF (JIVE.O) has surged to a 52-week high, driven by its active management strategy focused on global value stocks with ESG considerations. This equity ETF, which excludes U.S. markets, carries a 0.55% expense ratio and maintains a 1.0x leverage ratio. Recent fund flow data shows robust institutional participation, with $286,344.94 in net fund flows from orders, $178,141.98 from block orders, and $99,925.94 from extra-large orders on a single day. The ETF's long-only positioning aligns with its objective of capital appreciation through global market capitalization investments.


Technical analysis reveals no immediate signals from major indicators such as MACD crossovers, RSI levels, or pattern formations. The absence of golden/dead crosses, overbought/oversold conditions, or double-top/bottom patterns suggests the rally remains momentum-driven rather than technically confirmed. However, the 52-week high breakout itself represents a key psychological level that could attract further momentum traders.

The ETF's peer group includes leveraged equity strategies with significantly lower expense ratios. For instance, SPIB.P and SPBO.P maintain expense ratios below 0.05% while managing assets ranging from $2B to $11B. In contrast, JIVE.O's 0.55% fee ranks among the highest in its category, though its active management approach differentiates it from passive alternatives. The table below compares these leveraged ETFs across expense ratios, leverage ratios, and AUM metrics

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet