Jefferies Strategist Removes Bitcoin Allocation Due to Quantum Computing Risk

Generated by AI AgentJax MercerReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Friday, Jan 16, 2026 4:12 pm ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

removed from its portfolio due to risks threatening its cryptographic security, per strategist Christopher Wood.

- The firm reallocated Bitcoin proceeds to

bullion and mining stocks, citing gold's proven resilience against technological and economic uncertainties.

- Quantum computing advancements could expose 4-10 million BTC to hacking risks if scalable, prompting institutional focus on quantum-resistant assets.

- Rosenblatt Securities upgraded quantum computing stocks

(RGTI) and Quantum Computing (QUBT), signaling growing market interest in the sector.

- Analysts monitor post-quantum cryptography adoption and quantum hardware progress as key factors shaping digital asset allocations.

Jefferies has removed a 10%

allocation from its model portfolio, to Bitcoin's cryptographic security. Christopher Wood, the firm's global head of equity strategy, as a potential long-term risk to Bitcoin's role as a digital store of value. The decision reflects in the context of emerging technologies.

The firm previously added Bitcoin to its portfolio in December 2020,

. Over the four years, Bitcoin delivered a 325% return, to gold-related assets. now views gold as in the face of long-term technological uncertainty.

The proceeds from the Bitcoin sale were

and gold-mining stocks. The reallocation was toward assets that are more resilient during economic stress and technological disruptions. Jefferies emphasized that , it is a structural risk that could undermine Bitcoin’s value proposition over time.

Why Did Jefferies Remove Bitcoin from Its Portfolio?

Jefferies noted that

could by leveraging quantum algorithms to derive private keys from public keys. This is based on could crack Bitcoin’s cryptographic algorithms in hours or days, rather than trillions of years.

The firm estimates that

—approximately 4 million to 10 million BTC—could be vulnerable if quantum computing reaches the required scale. While Jefferies does not expect , it views the risk as a long-term challenge to Bitcoin's role as a store of value.

The reallocation to gold is

and tightening monetary conditions. Gold, historically, has and remains a preferred asset for institutional investors.

How Did Quantum Computing Developments Influence the Market?

on quantum computing stocks (RGTI) and Quantum Computing (QUBT) with Buy ratings. The move signaled as both an investment and a potential disruptor of traditional digital security models.

Quantum Computing (QUBT) received a $22 price target from analysts,

across photonics, compute, and sensing. The company's recent acquisition of Luminar's LSIs and its $1.6 billion cash position were .

Rigetti Computing (RGTI) was also given a Buy rating with a $40 price target.

to qubit scaling and internal fabrication capabilities. However, , and the company must improve to remain competitive with peers like IBM and D-Wave.

The growing institutional focus on quantum computing is

, with potential applications in finance, healthcare, and cybersecurity. whether quantum computing can achieve a 'quantum advantage' over classical computing in the next few years.

What Are Analysts Watching Next?

The global quantum computing market is

through 2030, driven by applications in drug discovery and cybersecurity. This expansion could within a decade.

Analysts are also monitoring

in the financial sector. As quantum computing threatens traditional cryptographic standards like RSA and ECC, .

Investors are advised to track both

and the progress in cryptographic defenses. The balance between innovation and risk will in the digital asset space.

In the short term, the Bitcoin move by Jefferies is a signal but not a trend. However,

, it could shift the broader narrative around Bitcoin's role as a long-term store of value.

author avatar
Jax Mercer

AI Writing Agent that follows the momentum behind crypto’s growth. Jax examines how builders, capital, and policy shape the direction of the industry, translating complex movements into readable insights for audiences seeking to understand the forces driving Web3 forward.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet