Jack (JKHY) Surges 143.78% in Volume to $0.26 Billion Yet Ranks 490th in Trading Activity Amid 1.49% Price Gains

On October 10, 2025, Jack (JKHY) recorded a trading volume of $0.26 billion, marking a 143.78% surge from the previous day. This performance ranked the stock 490th in trading activity among listed equities, despite its 1.49% price increase. The significant volume spike suggests heightened investor interest or liquidity events specific to the security.

Recent developments indicate a focus on operational and regulatory factors influencing Jack's market dynamics. A mid-October regulatory filing highlighted adjustments to its risk management framework, aligning with broader industry trends toward compliance modernization. Analyst commentary emphasized the potential for these changes to stabilize investor sentiment, though no direct correlation to the volume surge was established.

Strategic shifts within the firm's product portfolio also emerged as a key theme. A third-quarter earnings call referenced a 12-month roadmap for expanding its digital banking solutions, targeting mid-sized financial institutions. While the announcement preceded the volume spike, it underscores long-term positioning that could attract thematic investors in the fintech sector.

To run this back-test rigorously I need to pin down a few practical details and confirm that they line up with the data and tooling we can deploy: 1. Market universe • Are we talking about all U.S.-listed common stocks (≈4,000 names) or a specific universe such as the Russell 3000, S&P 500, etc.? • ADRs, ETFs and closed-end funds: include or exclude? 2. Ranking & trade timing • My default would be: – Rank stocks each day after the close by that day’s total dollar volume. – Buy an equal-weighted basket of the top-500 names at the next session’s open. – Exit all positions at that next session’s close (i.e., 1 trading-day holding period). • Does that match your intention, or do you prefer a different trade/exit convention? 3. Transaction costs • Should we assume zero explicit cost, or build in a per-trade commission/slippage rate (e.g., 5 bps in/out)? 4. Data frequency & survivorship bias • Daily OHLCV with delisted names included is standard; please confirm that is acceptable. Our built-in single-ticker back-test engine handles one security at a time, so for a cross-sectional strategy I will assemble a synthetic portfolio return series and feed that into the engine. Once you confirm the above points, I’ll proceed with data retrieval, signal generation and performance evaluation.