IonQ's Quantum Leap: Stock Surges 7.29% on $750M Volume, Ranks 124th as Analyst Day Nears

On September 9, 2025, , . The stock’s performance coincided with the announcement of its 2025 Analyst Day, scheduled for September 12 in New York City. The event will feature executive leadership detailing the company’s business strategy, product roadmap, and recent milestones, with live webcast access provided via the Investor Relations portal.

IonQ, a leader in commercial quantum computing, emphasized its advancements in scaling quantum systems and expanding partnerships with major cloud providers. , targeting applications in drug discovery, financial modeling, and cybersecurity. Recent integration of , such as Lightsynq’s solutions, is accelerating progress toward fault-tolerant quantum systems. Analysts noted that the event could bolster investor confidence by showcasing tangible progress in the company’s long-term vision.

To make sure I design the back-test exactly as you intend, could you please confirm a few details? 1. Market universe • Do you want to screen all U.S. common stocks (NYSE + NASDAQ), or a different universe (e.g., only S&P 500 constituents)? 2. Portfolio construction • Should the 500 stocks be equally weighted each day, or weighted by some other method (e.g., proportional to dollar volume)? • Trades executed at the day’s close, and positions closed at the next day’s close—correct? 3. Practical constraints • My current back-testing engine works on one ticker at a time. For a 500-stock daily-rebalanced portfolio I would need to spin up a custom multi-asset engine. - Are you open to an approximate approach (e.g., testing a representative ETF or a narrower subset) if the full 500-stock simulation is not immediately available? Once I have this information, I can either (a) run the closest possible test with the tools at hand, or (b) outline what additional data/steps are required for a full portfolio back-test.