Intel Shares Up 1.59% on $4.12B Volume 17th-Most-Traded as Mixed Signals Emerge

On October 7, 2025, Intel (INTC) surged 1.59% to close at $X.XX with a trading volume of $4.12 billion, ranking 17th in market activity. The chipmaker’s performance followed mixed signals from its product roadmap and manufacturing updates, which drew mixed investor sentiment.

Recent reports highlighted Intel’s progress in scaling its 18A process technology, a key differentiator in the semiconductor race. Analysts noted that the company’s ability to meet projected production timelines for advanced node chips could influence its competitive positioning against peers. However, delays in client PC demand recovery and ongoing supply chain constraints were cited as near-term headwinds in earnings calls.

Strategic partnerships and capital expenditures remained focal points. Intel confirmed expanded collaboration with foundry clients, though details on financial terms or delivery timelines were unspecified. The company also reiterated its commitment to $25 billion in U.S. manufacturing investments by 2028, a pledge tied to broader industry trends but not directly linked to immediate revenue drivers.

I understand the strategy you’d like to test, but there’s a practical hurdle: our current back-testing tools work on a single-ticker basis (or on a supplied list of event dates). Building and rebalancing a 500-stock portfolio every day would require a separate, pre-compiled file that tells the engine exactly which tickers belong in the portfolio on each trading day. To move forward, we have two possible paths: 1. You provide (or point to) a daily file that lists the 500 tickers with the highest volume for each date from 2022-01-01 to today. – With that file in hand, I can feed it to the back-testing engine and compute portfolio-level returns. 2. We narrow the scope so it fits within tool limits—for example: • Restrict the universe to a single index (e.g., the S&P 500) and rank the 500 stocks within that index, or • Evaluate a proxy, such as a high-volume ETF, instead of hundreds of individual stocks. Please let me know which approach you prefer (or if you have another idea), and I’ll proceed accordingly.