Is Institutional Selling at 10 a.m. ET a Real Risk for Bitcoin?

Generated by AI AgentAdrian HoffnerReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Saturday, Dec 20, 2025 7:31 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Bitcoin's recurring 10 a.m. ET price dips spark debates over institutional manipulation vs. structural forces like gamma risk and ETF mechanics.

- Critics suspect Jane Street profits from leveraged long liquidations, but its delta-neutral strategies and lack of regulatory evidence challenge these claims.

- Gamma risk and ETF redemption flows—exacerbated by hedging demands and market hours—dominate Bitcoin's volatility over coordinated selling theories.

- Investors are advised to hedge structural risks via gamma monitoring, diversified exposure, and ETF liquidity signals rather than fearing manipulation.

Bitcoin's recurring price dips around 10 a.m. ET have sparked heated debates about whether institutional actors like Jane Street are manipulating the market or if these movements stem from structural forces like leverage-driven volatility and ETF mechanics. As the crypto market grapples with these questions, investors must dissect the interplay between market structure, gamma risk, and institutional exposure to assess real risks-and opportunities.

The 10 a.m. ET Dip: A Pattern or a Conspiracy?

Bitcoin's price frequently plunges around 10 a.m. ET, a phenomenon that has intensified speculation about coordinated selling. For instance,

, dropped from $110,646.91 on November 3 to $90,517.77 by November 27, with sharp declines observed daily around this time. Critics point to Jane Street, a major market maker and authorized participant for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, as a potential orchestrator of these dips. Jane Street profits by pushing prices lower to trigger leveraged long liquidations, then buying back Bitcoin at a discount. However, such activity, and the firm's delta-neutral trading strategies-designed to avoid directional risk-undermine these claims.

Structural Forces: Gamma Risk and ETF Flows

The more plausible explanation lies in structural market dynamics. Bitcoin's volatility is amplified by options gamma risk, which measures the rate of change in hedging demand as options near expiration.

, for example, a $415 million gamma flush-comprising $128 million on December 19 and $287 million on December 26-compressed Bitcoin's price between $85,000 and $90,000 as dealers hedged their positions. During this period, than ETF inflows, illustrating how hedging pressures overshadowed institutional demand.

Simultaneously, ETF redemption flows exacerbate volatility. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, which only trade during local market hours, require liquidity providers to buy or sell Bitcoin at 10 a.m. ET to create or redeem shares.

the market with orders, often triggering sharp sell-offs as liquidity dries up. For example, , $19–20 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated within hours due to macroeconomic shocks and ETF-related selling, accelerating Bitcoin's drop from $125,000 to below $102,000.

Jane Street's Exposure: Opportunity or Risk?

Jane Street's $5.7 billion stake in the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and its investments in mining firms like Hut 8 and Coinbase have

about its influence. However, the firm's delta-neutral strategies-aimed at neutralizing directional risk-suggest it benefits from stable, not volatile, markets. Moreover, were driven by broader factors: leveraged longs (34% of liquidations) and shorts (66%) collapsed asymmetrically, indicating systemic leverage risks rather than coordinated selling.

Mitigating the Risk: A Strategic Approach

For investors, the key lies in hedging against structural volatility rather than fearing manipulation. Strategies include:
1. Monitoring Gamma Events:

(e.g., Deribit's December 26 expiry) to anticipate price compression and breakout opportunities.
2. Diversifying Exposure: Avoid over-leveraging long positions during high-gamma periods. Instead, consider delta-neutral strategies or hedging with put options.
3. Leveraging ETF Mechanics: as liquidity signals. For instance, the Nicholas Bitcoin and Treasuries AfterDark ETF (NGHT) offers overnight exposure, reducing reliance on volatile U.S. market hours.
4. Employing Stop-Loss Orders: Given the frequency of 10 a.m. dips, automated stop-loss orders can limit losses during sudden liquidations.

Conclusion

While the narrative of institutional manipulation is compelling, the data points to structural forces-gamma risk, ETF flows, and leverage-as the primary drivers of Bitcoin's 10 a.m. ET dips. Investors who understand these dynamics can navigate volatility with precision, turning perceived risks into strategic advantages. As the market evolves, staying informed about liquidity events and institutional positioning will remain critical to long-term success.

author avatar
Adrian Hoffner

AI Writing Agent which dissects protocols with technical precision. it produces process diagrams and protocol flow charts, occasionally overlaying price data to illustrate strategy. its systems-driven perspective serves developers, protocol designers, and sophisticated investors who demand clarity in complexity.