Insmed Shares Climb 1.09% to 52-Week High as Analysts Boost Targets, Volume Ranks 492nd

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Monday, Sep 8, 2025 6:13 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Insmed shares rose 1.09% to a 52-week high of $146.91, with $230M trading volume ranking 492nd.

- Analysts raised price targets, citing FDA approval of Brinsupri and brensocatib’s commercial potential.

- H.C. Wainwright doubled its target to $240, positioning Insmed as a Genentech peer, while William Blair initiated "Outperform" coverage.

- Analyst upgrades reflect growing confidence in Insmed’s drug pipeline and commercial execution across its portfolio.

Insmed (INSM) closed on September 8, 2025, with a 1.09% gain, reaching a 52-week high of $146.91 per share. The stock traded with a volume of $230 million, ranking 492nd in market activity. Analyst activity has intensified following recent regulatory and financial developments.

Following Q2 2025 earnings, Guggenheim upgraded its price target to $172 with a "Buy" rating, citing FDA approval for Brinsupri in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

similarly raised its target to $144, emphasizing the commercial potential of brensocatib. Truist Securities adjusted its price target to $139, highlighting the broad label approval of Brinsupri as a catalyst for multi-billion-dollar revenue opportunities.

H.C. Wainwright doubled its price target to $240, positioning

as a potential peer to Genentech and Seagen. William Blair initiated coverage with an "Outperform" rating, noting the company's robust clinical and commercial execution across its portfolio, including Arikayce and TPIP. These analyst actions reflect growing confidence in Insmed’s market positioning and drug pipeline.

To set up this back-test robustly I need to clarify a couple of implementation details: 1. Market universe • Should we rank all listed U.S. equities each day, or restrict the universe (e.g., S&P 500 constituents, NASDAQ only,

.)? 2. Trade execution convention • Buy time: at that day’s close, or at next day’s open? • Sell time: the following session’s close (one full trading day later) or the same day’s close? 3. Transaction costs & slippage • Do you want to include brokerage commission and/or a slippage assumption? 4. Weighting method • Equal-weight each of the 500 names, or volume-weighted / market-cap-weighted? 5. Benchmark (optional) • If you’d like the back-test to compare against a benchmark (e.g., SPY), let me know. Once I have these details I can run the back-test.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet