Insert and List Data via Google BigQuery Adapter for SAP Integration Suite

Google BigQuery Adapter for SAP Integration Suite allows for data insertion and listing in tables. To insert data, a payload is prepared with various data types and multiple values in a single record. The adapter connects to Google BigQuery and uses columnar data storage, making it cloud-based and serverless. The adapter also supports various data types such as STRING, INTEGER, FLOAT, BYTES, BOOLEAN, DATE, DATETIME, INTEGER, TIME, GEOGRAPHY, NUMERIC, BIGNUMERIC, RECORD, and more.

The data storage sector is undergoing a significant shift as enterprises prioritize cloud-native solutions, AI-driven infrastructure, and hybrid cloud flexibility. Among the key players, Pure Storage (PSTG) has emerged as a standout performer, outpacing peers like NetApp (NTAP) and Nutanix (NTNX) in recent earnings results, strategic execution, and shareholder returns. This divergence in fortunes highlights a critical question for investors: Which storage stocks are best positioned to capitalize on the evolving IT landscape?

Pure Storage: A Model of Execution and Confidence

Pure Storage's Q2 2025 results underscore its accelerating momentum. The company reported $861 million in revenue, a 12.7% year-over-year increase and a 1.7% beat over estimates. This outperformance was driven by robust demand for its Enterprise Data Cloud (EDC) and next-generation storage solutions like FlashArray//XL and FlashBlade//S. Pure's non-GAAP operating margin of 15.1% reflects improved profitability, while its $1.5 billion in cash reserves and $42 million in Q2 buybacks signal disciplined capital allocation.

What truly sets Pure apart is its guidance raise. The company now expects $3.62 billion in full-year revenue (up 2.8% from prior guidance) and $955 million in Q3 revenue (4.6% above analyst estimates). This confidence stems from strategic bets on AI infrastructure—such as the GenAI Pod for generative AI workloads and FlashBlade//S500 certification with NVIDIA DGX SuperPOD—and a shift toward all-flash storage that displaces legacy HDDs [1].

NetApp: Stability Over Aggression

NetApp's fiscal 2025 results were solid but less dynamic. The company reported $6.57 billion in revenue (5% growth) and $4.1 billion in all-flash ARR (14% growth). Its non-GAAP operating margin of 28% and $1.57 billion in shareholder returns (via buybacks and dividends) highlight its financial discipline. However, NetApp's revenue growth lags behind Pure's, and its cloud strategy—while expanding—remains more focused on enterprise data management than AI-specific innovations [1].

NetApp's recent $416 million in public cloud services revenue (43% growth) and partnerships with AWS, Microsoft, and Google Cloud position it well for hybrid cloud demand. Yet, its 2026 guidance—projecting $6.625–6.875 billion in revenue (4–6% growth)—suggests a more conservative trajectory compared to Pure's aggressive expansion [1].

Nutanix: Hybrid Cloud Pacesetter, But With Constraints

Nutanix's fiscal 2025 results were impressive: $2.54 billion in revenue (18% growth), $750 million in free cash flow, and a Rule of 40 score of 48. Its non-GAAP operating margin of 21.1% and $350 million in expanded buybacks reflect strong execution. Nutanix's hybrid multicloud platform—bolstered by partnerships with AWS, NVIDIA, and Google—has attracted 2,700 new customers, and its Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) is gaining traction in containerized environments [1].

However, Nutanix's 2026 guidance—$2.9–2.94 billion in revenue (11–12% growth)—is modest compared to Pure's 11% target. While Nutanix excels in enterprise AI and modern applications, its cloud storage strategy remains more generalized, lacking the architectural breakthroughs (e.g., EDC) that Pure has introduced [1].

Strategic Execution: Innovation vs. Capital Allocation

The key differentiator lies in strategic execution. Pure Storage's product innovation—including Pure Fusion v2 and DirectFlash software—positions it to disrupt hyperscale environments traditionally dominated by HDDs. Its $250 million in incremental buybacks and $374 million returned in FY25 demonstrate a commitment to shareholder value, but its guidance raises suggest a focus on growth over short-term returns [1].

NetApp and Nutanix, meanwhile, prioritize capital efficiency and dividend yields. NetApp's 28% non-GAAP margin and $1.57 billion in shareholder returns make it a defensive play, while Nutanix's Rule of 40 score and hybrid cloud partnerships appeal to investors seeking balanced growth and profitability [1].

Investment Implications

For long-term investors, Pure Storage appears best positioned to capitalize on the AI and cloud-native storage boom. Its 12.7% revenue growth, guidance optimism, and product-led innovation align with the sector's trajectory. However, NetApp and Nutanix offer compelling alternatives for those prioritizing stable cash flows or hybrid cloud adoption [1].

Conclusion

The data storage sector is diverging: Pure Storage is betting big on AI-driven infrastructure and architectural innovation, while NetApp and Nutanix focus on hybrid cloud stability and capital efficiency. For investors seeking high-growth exposure, Pure's aggressive execution and market confidence make it a top pick. However, those prioritizing dividend yields or enterprise data management may find NetApp's established ecosystem or Nutanix's hybrid cloud platform more appealing. As the IT landscape evolves, the company that best balances innovation with profitability will emerge as the sector's leader [1].

References:

[1] https://www.ainvest.com/news/rise-pure-storage-diverging-fortunes-data-storage-sector-2508/