Hyperliquid News Today: Hyperliquid's $4.9M Loss Exposes DeFi's Immaturity in Risk Management

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Wednesday, Nov 12, 2025 8:16 pm ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Hyperliquid paused its Arbitrum bridge after a $4.9M loss from a POPCAT meme coin price manipulation scheme, as reported by Coinotag.

- A trader used $3M in stablecoins to artificially inflate POPCAT's price, triggering liquidations and exposing DeFi's risks in volatile assets.

- The incident mirrors a 2025 JELLYJELLY manipulation case, with experts criticizing Hyperliquid's immaturity in balancing decentralization and risk controls.

- Analysts urge stronger safeguards for community-funded pools, as platforms expand into speculative assets with inherent liquidation vulnerabilities.

Hyperliquid, a decentralized perpetual futures exchange, temporarily paused its

bridge on Wednesday after a suspected price manipulation scheme involving the Solana-based coin POPCAT caused a $4.9 million loss to its community-owned vault, according to a . The incident has reignited concerns about the risks of leveraged trading in decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, particularly for volatile assets like meme coins.

According to on-chain analysts, an individual-identified on X as MLMabc-used $3 million in stablecoins to open a $20 million long position on POPCAT across 19 wallets. The trader placed large buy orders at $0.21 per token to artificially inflate demand, creating a "buy wall." When the wall was abruptly removed, the price of POPCAT collapsed, triggering immediate liquidation of the $20–30 million position. Hyperliquid's liquidity provider (HLP) was forced to take over the position to fulfill obligations, resulting in the significant loss, as reported by a

.

Hyperliquid activated its EmergencyLock function to halt deposits and withdrawals via the Arbitrum bridge, preventing further exploitation, as . The platform restored normal operations within hours, with no broader blockchain disruptions reported, as . A Hyperliquid Discord admin noted the pause was limited to the Arbitrum bridge, emphasizing that other deposit and withdrawal channels remained unaffected.

This incident echoes a March 2025 event where a trader manipulated the

meme coin JELLYJELLY, causing the HLP vault to absorb roughly $12 million in unrealized losses, as . Such episodes have drawn criticism about Hyperliquid's ability to balance decentralization with risk management. Steven Zheng, research director at The Block, noted the pause highlights Hyperliquid's immaturity compared to centralized exchanges, stating, "While the platform aims to compete as a liquid decentralized perpetual exchange, it remains far from that goal," as .

POPCAT, with a market capitalization of $136 million, had risen 5.6% in the 24 hours preceding the incident but remained down 91% annually, according to

. Analysts emphasized that meme coins' inherent volatility exacerbates liquidation risks in leveraged trading environments. The Block's Zheng added that platforms like Hyperliquid must strengthen safeguards to prevent "cascading failures" in community-funded pools, as .

Hyperliquid has not publicly acknowledged the specific cause of the loss but confirmed the vault's exposure to liquidations. The exchange's status page showed no ongoing issues as of late Wednesday, as

. Meanwhile, the trader behind the POPCAT scheme described the activity as a "deliberate attempt to mess" with Hyperliquid and its vault, though the exchange has not commented on the claim, as .

The incident underscores broader challenges in DeFi, where community-managed liquidity pools face unique vulnerabilities. As platforms expand into speculative assets, experts urge tighter position limits and enhanced monitoring to mitigate risks. For now, Hyperliquid's response—swiftly isolating the affected bridge—demonstrates standard protocol in preventing systemic damage, according to blockchain security researchers, as

.

---