Hubspot Slides 1.78% Amid Bearish Signals As Key Support At $453 Holds
Generated by AI AgentAinvest Technical Radar
Friday, Sep 5, 2025 6:41 pm ET2min read
HUBS--
Aime Summary
Hubspot (HUBS) declined by 1.78% in the latest session, closing at $464.31 after testing an intraday low of $453.03. This comprehensive technical analysis evaluates the stock’s trajectory using multiple indicators and methodologies. The following sections detail key findings, with particular attention to confluence points and divergences across indicators.
Candlestick Theory
Recent candlestick patterns reveal a short-term bearish bias, though signs of support are emerging. The September 4 session formed a hammer-like pattern (long lower wick and close near the high of the range), suggesting rejection of prices below $453. This level now serves as immediate support, aligning with the August 22 low of $454.91. Resistance is evident near $479–$485, validated by multiple failed attempts to break above this zone in late August and early September. The hammer pattern following a three-day decline may indicate exhaustion if confirmed by bullish follow-through.
Moving Average Theory
The 50-day moving average (~$462) provides dynamic support, with the current price hovering just above this level. However, the medium-to-long-term trend remains bearish, evidenced by the 100-day MA (~$508) and 200-day MA (~$577) trending downward above the price. A sustained break below the 50-day MA would likely accelerate selling pressure, while any recovery would face stiff resistance near the 100-day MA. The 50/100-day death cross in mid-July persists, reinforcing the entrenched downtrend.
MACD & KDJ Indicators
The MACD histogram shows narrowing bearish momentum, with the MACD line (-5.5) converging toward the signal line (-7.2), suggesting weakening downward pressure. Meanwhile, the KDJ oscillator flashes oversold signals: The %K line (18) and %D line (22) are below 30, typically indicating exhaustion. However, this divergence—oversold KDJ amid bearish MACD—implies unresolved tension between near-term bounce potential and intermediate bearish inertia. A bullish MACD crossover would strengthen reversal prospects.
Bollinger Bands
Volatility contraction is evident, with the 20-day BollingerBINI-- Band width narrowing by 15% over the past week, signaling reduced directional conviction. Price currently trades near the lower band ($452), which aligns with the $453 support. The September 4 rejection at this band underscores its technical relevance. A sustained break below the lower band would imply an impending volatility expansion and continuation of the downtrend, whereas a rebound could trigger a mean-reversion rally toward the 20-day SMA ($467).
Volume-Price Relationship
Volume analysis reveals bearish conviction in the latest decline, with September 4’s sell-off registering 1.06 million shares—30% above the 10-day average. However, the intraday recovery from $453 coincided with the highest volume in a week, hinting at accumulation near support. Notably, the August rally from $418 to $485 featured consistently rising volume, validating that upswing. Current volume patterns suggest $453–$460 is a battle zone; failure to hold this on above-average volume may trigger a retest of the August low ($418).
Relative Strength Index (RSI)
The 14-day RSI (36) resides in neutral territory, avoiding oversold conditions despite recent declines. This divergence—failing to breach 30 despite price testing key support—raises concerns about underlying weakness. RSI has trended downward since late August (from 62 to 36), reflecting building bearish momentum. While not oversold, the indicator’s warning nature suggests downside risk remains unless RSI reclaims 50, which would signal improving momentum.
Fibonacci Retracement
Applying Fibonacci levels to the rally from the August 11 low ($418.34) to the August 29 high ($485.52) highlights critical retracement zones. The 50% retracement ($451.93) and 61.8% level ($459.84) frame key support, with the September 4 low ($453.03) testing the former. This confluence—bolstered by the $453 candlestick support and Bollinger Band—enhances technical significance. A decisive break below the 50% level would expose the 38.2% retracement ($444), while recovery above the 61.8% level ($459.84) would shift focus to the 23.6% resistance ($475).
Confluence and Divergence Synthesis
Confluence emerges at $450–$455, where Fibonacci support (50%), the 50-day MA, Bollinger lower band, and candlestick structure align. This zone must hold to prevent a deeper retracement toward $418. Divergence exists between oversold KDJ signals and non-oversold RSI, suggesting mixed momentum signals. Additionally, bearish volume and moving average positioning contrast with potential reversal patterns (hammer candle, MACD convergence). Overall, the technical framework suggests a fragile balance between bearish structure and short-term bounce potential. A breach below $450 would likely trigger cascading selling, while a close above $475 (resolving KDJ/RSI divergence) may signal a tactical rally. Investors should monitor these thresholds for directional confirmation, using probabilistic language to emphasize that indicators offer guidance—not certainty—in evolving conditions.
Hubspot (HUBS) declined by 1.78% in the latest session, closing at $464.31 after testing an intraday low of $453.03. This comprehensive technical analysis evaluates the stock’s trajectory using multiple indicators and methodologies. The following sections detail key findings, with particular attention to confluence points and divergences across indicators.
Candlestick Theory
Recent candlestick patterns reveal a short-term bearish bias, though signs of support are emerging. The September 4 session formed a hammer-like pattern (long lower wick and close near the high of the range), suggesting rejection of prices below $453. This level now serves as immediate support, aligning with the August 22 low of $454.91. Resistance is evident near $479–$485, validated by multiple failed attempts to break above this zone in late August and early September. The hammer pattern following a three-day decline may indicate exhaustion if confirmed by bullish follow-through.
Moving Average Theory
The 50-day moving average (~$462) provides dynamic support, with the current price hovering just above this level. However, the medium-to-long-term trend remains bearish, evidenced by the 100-day MA (~$508) and 200-day MA (~$577) trending downward above the price. A sustained break below the 50-day MA would likely accelerate selling pressure, while any recovery would face stiff resistance near the 100-day MA. The 50/100-day death cross in mid-July persists, reinforcing the entrenched downtrend.
MACD & KDJ Indicators
The MACD histogram shows narrowing bearish momentum, with the MACD line (-5.5) converging toward the signal line (-7.2), suggesting weakening downward pressure. Meanwhile, the KDJ oscillator flashes oversold signals: The %K line (18) and %D line (22) are below 30, typically indicating exhaustion. However, this divergence—oversold KDJ amid bearish MACD—implies unresolved tension between near-term bounce potential and intermediate bearish inertia. A bullish MACD crossover would strengthen reversal prospects.
Bollinger Bands
Volatility contraction is evident, with the 20-day BollingerBINI-- Band width narrowing by 15% over the past week, signaling reduced directional conviction. Price currently trades near the lower band ($452), which aligns with the $453 support. The September 4 rejection at this band underscores its technical relevance. A sustained break below the lower band would imply an impending volatility expansion and continuation of the downtrend, whereas a rebound could trigger a mean-reversion rally toward the 20-day SMA ($467).
Volume-Price Relationship
Volume analysis reveals bearish conviction in the latest decline, with September 4’s sell-off registering 1.06 million shares—30% above the 10-day average. However, the intraday recovery from $453 coincided with the highest volume in a week, hinting at accumulation near support. Notably, the August rally from $418 to $485 featured consistently rising volume, validating that upswing. Current volume patterns suggest $453–$460 is a battle zone; failure to hold this on above-average volume may trigger a retest of the August low ($418).
Relative Strength Index (RSI)
The 14-day RSI (36) resides in neutral territory, avoiding oversold conditions despite recent declines. This divergence—failing to breach 30 despite price testing key support—raises concerns about underlying weakness. RSI has trended downward since late August (from 62 to 36), reflecting building bearish momentum. While not oversold, the indicator’s warning nature suggests downside risk remains unless RSI reclaims 50, which would signal improving momentum.
Fibonacci Retracement
Applying Fibonacci levels to the rally from the August 11 low ($418.34) to the August 29 high ($485.52) highlights critical retracement zones. The 50% retracement ($451.93) and 61.8% level ($459.84) frame key support, with the September 4 low ($453.03) testing the former. This confluence—bolstered by the $453 candlestick support and Bollinger Band—enhances technical significance. A decisive break below the 50% level would expose the 38.2% retracement ($444), while recovery above the 61.8% level ($459.84) would shift focus to the 23.6% resistance ($475).
Confluence and Divergence Synthesis
Confluence emerges at $450–$455, where Fibonacci support (50%), the 50-day MA, Bollinger lower band, and candlestick structure align. This zone must hold to prevent a deeper retracement toward $418. Divergence exists between oversold KDJ signals and non-oversold RSI, suggesting mixed momentum signals. Additionally, bearish volume and moving average positioning contrast with potential reversal patterns (hammer candle, MACD convergence). Overall, the technical framework suggests a fragile balance between bearish structure and short-term bounce potential. A breach below $450 would likely trigger cascading selling, while a close above $475 (resolving KDJ/RSI divergence) may signal a tactical rally. Investors should monitor these thresholds for directional confirmation, using probabilistic language to emphasize that indicators offer guidance—not certainty—in evolving conditions.

Si he logrado llegar más lejos, es gracias a haber tomado prestados los conocimientos de aquellos “gigantes” que han avanzado más que yo.
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet