Hong Kong's Stablecoin Framework May Boost Mainland Firms' Global Competitiveness

Coin WorldMonday, Jun 2, 2025 9:22 pm ET
1min read

GF Securities has highlighted the potential impact of Hong Kong's proposed regulatory framework for stablecoins, suggesting that it could offer a compliant pathway for mainland companies to issue RMB-pegged stablecoins through Hong Kong. This move is expected to facilitate cross-border trade and investment, thereby enhancing the competitiveness of mainland companies in the global market and attracting additional funds into A-shares. However, the analysts note that the current harsh policy environment for virtual currencies makes it unlikely that large-scale incremental funds will enter A-shares in the near future.

In the short term, the introduction of stablecoins in Hong Kong is anticipated to bring structural opportunities to the stock market. Sectors such as digital currency, cross-border payments, blockchain, and Real World Asset Tokenization (RWA) are expected to benefit from this development. Stablecoins could also serve as a strategic tool for the United States to defend the status of the dollar, potentially alleviating some of the selling pressure on the dollar and U.S. bonds. Nevertheless, the limited scale of stablecoins and intensified competition may constrain the short-term boosting effect on the dollar and U.S. bonds.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet

Disclaimer: The news articles available on this platform are generated in whole or in part by artificial intelligence and may not have been reviewed or fact checked by human editors. While we make reasonable efforts to ensure the quality and accuracy of the content, we make no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the truthfulness, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of any information provided. It is your sole responsibility to independently verify any facts, statements, or claims prior to acting upon them. Ainvest Fintech Inc expressly disclaims all liability for any loss, damage, or harm arising from the use of or reliance on AI-generated content, including but not limited to direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages.