Hong Kong's Digital Banks: A New Chapter with Physical Branches?

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has been instrumental in driving the growth of digital banks in the region, with the introduction of the Smart Banking Era Strategy in 2017 and the subsequent launch of eight virtual banks in 2020. However, as the competition in the retail banking sector intensifies and virtual banks struggle to achieve profitability, the HKMA has announced a review of the virtual banking sector. One of the key outcomes of this review is the proposal to rename "Virtual Bank" to "Digital Bank," which is currently under public consultation.



The HKMA's review, published in August 2024, assessed the delivery of the three policy objectives for introducing virtual banks to Hong Kong, evaluated market acceptance, business performance, and user response, and discussed challenges faced by virtual banks. The review also recommended steps for further development of the virtual banking industry. One of the key findings was that the current number of virtual banking licenses is optimal, and there is no strong justification to introduce more new players to the market at this juncture.

As the competition in the retail banking sector continues to grow, virtual banks are exploring new strategies to differentiate themselves and attract customers. One such strategy is the consideration of opening physical branches, despite the HKMA's encouragement for digital banks to focus on digital channels. This shift in strategy could be driven by several factors, including the need to cater to customers who prefer face-to-face interactions, the desire to expand market reach, and the potential for increased customer loyalty through a more personalized banking experience.



However, opening physical branches may not be a viable or cost-effective strategy for all virtual banks. The HKMA's rule change, which encourages digital banks to focus on digital channels and reduces the requirement for physical branches, has made it more challenging for virtual banks to justify the investment in physical infrastructure. Additionally, the increasing adoption of digital banking services and the shift in customer preferences towards digital channels make it more cost-effective for virtual banks to invest in digital infrastructure rather than physical branches.

In conclusion, the HKMA's review of the virtual banking sector and the proposal to rename "Virtual Bank" to "Digital Bank" highlight the need for virtual banks to adapt and innovate in the face of increasing competition and changing customer preferences. While some virtual banks may consider opening physical branches to differentiate themselves and attract customers, the HKMA's rule change and the shift in customer preferences towards digital channels make it more challenging for virtual banks to justify the investment in physical infrastructure. As the virtual banking sector continues to evolve, it will be crucial for virtual banks to stay focused on their core strengths and adapt their strategies to meet the changing needs of their customers.

Word count: 598