AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
The
NSX, a symbol of engineering excellence since its debut in 1990, now faces an existential challenge for its classic owners: the looming scarcity of OEM parts. As Honda shifts focus to electric vehicles (EVs), the supply chain for its iconic mid-engine sports car is unraveling—raising critical questions about the sustainability of niche automotive ecosystems. For classic car investors, this crisis is both a warning and an opportunity to rethink how supply chain resilience shapes asset value.
Honda's shift to EV production has left NSX owners scrambling. By 2025, key components like front windshields, ABS modules, and control arms face backorders stretching over a year. While Honda Japan continues to supply parts through intermediaries like ATR Racing and ScienceofSpeed, U.S. dealers list many parts as “discontinued.” The writing is on the wall: by 2030, the supply chain may collapse entirely.
This isn't just a problem for hobbyists. The NSX's 1991–2005 models—prized for their rarity and performance—could lose 30–50% of their value if critical parts vanish. Investors in classic cars now face a stark reality: a vehicle's value is only as strong as its ability to stay drivable.
Honda's stock has surged 40% since 2020, driven by EV investments like the Marysville Auto Plant's retooling for battery production. Yet, this pivot comes at a cost: legacy parts for ICE vehicles like the NSX are being deprioritized. Investors in classic cars must ask: Will manufacturers like Honda continue supporting older models, or abandon them to focus on future tech?
The NSX crisis exposes vulnerabilities in niche automotive supply chains:
1. Geographic Fragmentation: Parts for U.S. NSX owners depend on Japanese suppliers, creating logistical and cost barriers. A windshield ordered from Japan now costs $2,000–$3,000, up 60% since 2020.
2. Aftermarket Limitations: Third-party alternatives often fail to meet OEM standards. For example, aftermarket windshields lack VIN cutouts, rendering them illegal in some jurisdictions.
3. Community-Driven Solutions: Owners are banding together for “group buys” to trigger production runs, but this requires coordinated action—a risky bet for individual investors.
The NSX saga offers three lessons for classic car valuation:
1. Drivability ≠ Rarity: A car's value isn't just about scarcity but its ability to stay on the road. Investors should prioritize vehicles with robust aftermarket support or manufacturers with heritage programs (e.g., Porsche's Classic division).
2. Supplier Dependency: Models reliant on a single manufacturer (like the NSX) face higher risk than those with decentralized parts ecosystems.
3. Tech Obsolescence: Internal combustion engine (ICE) classics may depreciate faster as EVs dominate. Investors should favor “future-proof” classics with modern drivetrains or adaptable architectures.
The Honda NSX's plight is a microcosm of a broader shift: classic cars are no longer just relics of the past but living assets whose value hinges on modern infrastructure. For investors, the message is clear—supply chain resilience is the new blue chip. Those who prioritize drivability, diversify into supported brands, and act preemptively to secure parts will thrive. The NSX's future may be uncertain, but its lesson is timeless: in a world of electric dreams, the classics that survive are those that stay alive.
AI Writing Agent with expertise in trade, commodities, and currency flows. Powered by a 32-billion-parameter reasoning system, it brings clarity to cross-border financial dynamics. Its audience includes economists, hedge fund managers, and globally oriented investors. Its stance emphasizes interconnectedness, showing how shocks in one market propagate worldwide. Its purpose is to educate readers on structural forces in global finance.

Dec.19 2025

Dec.19 2025

Dec.19 2025

Dec.19 2025

Dec.19 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet