On Holding AG Dips as Analysts Clash Over Valuation Amid 472nd Trading Volume Rank

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Tuesday, Sep 2, 2025 6:16 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- On Holding AG (ONON) fell 0.64% on Sept 2 with $230M volume, ranking 472nd in market activity.

- Analysts issued mixed ratings (19 buys, 1 hold, 1 sell), citing 30.3% EPS growth but a 98.99 P/E vs sector 27.07.

- Short interest dropped 17.93% monthly to 6.77%, while UBS raised its target to $79 and Jefferies downgraded to "Sell."

- Elevated valuation metrics (PEG 4.97, P/B 17.78) and divergent institutional activity highlight ongoing uncertainty.

On Holding AG (ONON) fell 0.64% on September 2, with a trading volume of $230 million, ranking 472nd in market activity. The stock faces mixed analyst sentiment, with a "Moderate Buy" consensus rating based on 19 buy, 1 hold, and 1 sell recommendation. Earnings growth is projected to rise 30.30% annually, though its P/E ratio of 98.99 remains elevated compared to the 27.07 sector average and significantly higher than the market’s 269.24. Short interest stands at 6.77% of float, with a 17.93% monthly decline indicating improving investor sentiment.

Institutional activity has been mixed, with purchases from Aragon Global Management, Stony Point Capital, and

, while and others reduced holdings. UBS raised its price target to $79, citing growth potential despite an EPS loss, while downgraded the stock to "Sell." Recent news highlights include record sales and strategic growth initiatives, though valuation metrics like a PEG ratio of 4.97 and P/B ratio of 17.78 suggest potential overvaluation concerns.

The stock’s performance reflects divergent analyst views, with Bernstein and BTIG maintaining buy ratings, while Jefferies signaled caution. Institutional transactions and valuation adjustments underscore ongoing uncertainty. The P/E ratio’s disparity with sector peers and elevated short interest ratios highlight risks, even as reduced short selling hints at stabilizing sentiment.

Backtesting indicates the stock dropped 4.2% in a prior session, though this figure should be interpreted alongside the 0.64% decline reported on September 2. Analyst upgrades and downgrades continue to shape the narrative, with UBS and Jefferies offering contrasting outlooks on the company’s near-term trajectory.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet