High-Yield Bond ETFs and Dividend Performance: Assessing FALN’s Role in a Shifting Market

Generated by AI AgentEli Grant
Tuesday, Sep 2, 2025 1:16 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- FALN targets "fallen angels" bonds (downgraded from investment-grade), offering 6.15%-6.21% yield with monthly payouts.

- Its yield lags the 7.5% ICE BofA high-yield index but historically outperformed broader market in 14 of 20 years.

- FALN shows 17 dividend cuts vs. 19 increases in 3 years, contrasting HYLS's 15.66% 2025 growth.

- Sharpe ratio (1.07) trails SCYB (1.38), but FALN's 4.89 duration may boost returns in falling rate environments.

- Macroeconomic slowdown risks by 2026 could pressure FALN, balancing yield potential against credit resilience needs.

The high-yield bond market has long been a magnet for income-focused investors, offering elevated returns in exchange for increased credit risk. Among the key players in this space, the iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) has carved out a niche by targeting bonds that were once investment-grade but have since been downgraded. As of August 2025,

offers a dividend yield of 6.15% to 6.21%, with monthly payouts that have grown by 1.56% year-to-date [1][2][3]. This performance places FALN in a unique position within the broader high-yield landscape, where the ICE BofA US High Yield Index currently yields 7.5% [4].

FALN’s strategy of focusing on “fallen angels” reflects a deliberate trade-off between yield and credit quality. These bonds, originally rated investment-grade, often retain higher average credit quality than the broader high-yield universe, which includes more speculative-grade (B and below) issuers [5]. However, this approach comes with a yield penalty: FALN’s 6.21% yield lags behind the 7.5% of the ICE BofA index, a gap that underscores the market’s preference for riskier, higher-coupon bonds [4]. Yet, fallen angels have historically outperformed the broader high-yield market in 14 of the last 20 years, suggesting their value proposition may be more nuanced than a simple yield comparison [5].

The ETF’s dividend performance, however, reveals a more volatile picture. Over the past three years, FALN has experienced 17 dividend reductions and 19 increases, reflecting the inherent instability of its underlying holdings [3]. By contrast, the First Trust High Yield Long/Short ETF (HYLS), an actively managed peer, has demonstrated a 15.66% dividend growth rate in 2025, with payouts rising from $0.208 to $0.240 per share [6]. This divergence highlights the challenges of passive strategies in a market where credit conditions can shift rapidly.

Risk-adjusted metrics further complicate FALN’s positioning. While it offers a compelling yield, its Sharpe ratio of 1.07 and Sortino ratio of 1.51 trail those of the Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB), which has a Sharpe ratio of 1.38 and a Sortino ratio of 2.04 [2]. SCYB’s lower expense ratio (0.03% vs. FALN’s 0.25%) and broader diversification also make it a more efficient option for many investors [2]. Yet FALN’s longer effective duration (4.89 vs. SCYB’s 3.09) could amplify returns in a falling rate environment, as seen in early 2025 when falling interest rates and tightening credit spreads benefited fallen angels [5].

The broader high-yield market remains in a delicate balance. While spreads have tightened to 310 basis points and default rates remain low, dispersion among bonds has increased, with 64% of constituents trading within 100 basis points of the index [4]. This suggests a market where selectivity is paramount. For FALN, this means its focus on fallen angels may offer a buffer against the most volatile segments of the high-yield universe, but it also limits upside potential in a rally.

Looking ahead, macroeconomic signals point to a potential slowdown by 2026, which could pressure high-yield ETFs like FALN, SCYB, and the iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) [7]. Investors must weigh FALN’s yield advantages against its higher volatility (1.17% vs. SCYB’s 1.01%) and the risk of further dividend cuts as credit conditions evolve [2].

In conclusion, FALN occupies a unique but precarious position in the high-yield bond market. Its focus on fallen angels offers a blend of income and relative credit quality, but its dividend volatility and risk-adjusted returns suggest it is best suited for investors with a higher risk tolerance and a strategic view on interest rates. As the market navigates a potential downturn, the ETF’s performance will hinge on its ability to balance yield generation with credit resilience.

Source:
[1] iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) Dividend History, [https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/etf/faln/dividend-history]
[2] FALN vs. SCYB — ETF Comparison Tool, [https://portfolioslab.com/tools/stock-comparison/FALN/SCYB]
[3] FALN Dividend Information iShares Fallen Angels USD ..., [https://marketchameleon.com/Overview/FALN/Dividends/]
[4] High Yield Market Update, [https://www.newyorklifeinvestments.com/mackay-shields/insights/high-yield-market-update]
[5] Fallen Angel Bonds: Higher Quality High Yield, [https://www.etf.com/sections/etf-industry-perspective/fallen-angel-bonds-higher-quality-high-yield]
[6] First Trust High Yield Long/Short ETF (HYLS) ETF Dividends, [https://stockinvest.us/dividends/HYLS]
[7] High-Yield ETFs in Cooling Market: Proceed With Caution, [https://www.etf.com/sections/advisor-center/high-yield-dividend-etfs-market-risk-2025]

author avatar
Eli Grant

AI Writing Agent powered by a 32-billion-parameter hybrid reasoning model, designed to switch seamlessly between deep and non-deep inference layers. Optimized for human preference alignment, it demonstrates strength in creative analysis, role-based perspectives, multi-turn dialogue, and precise instruction following. With agent-level capabilities, including tool use and multilingual comprehension, it brings both depth and accessibility to economic research. Primarily writing for investors, industry professionals, and economically curious audiences, Eli’s personality is assertive and well-researched, aiming to challenge common perspectives. His analysis adopts a balanced yet critical stance on market dynamics, with a purpose to educate, inform, and occasionally disrupt familiar narratives. While maintaining credibility and influence within financial journalism, Eli focuses on economics, market trends, and investment analysis. His analytical and direct style ensures clarity, making even complex market topics accessible to a broad audience without sacrificing rigor.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet