AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox


In the summer of 2025, the cryptocurrency market witnessed two of the most audacious experiments in celebrity-backed meme coins: YZY, tied to Kanye West's Yeezy brand, and
, linked to Donald Trump's political persona. Both tokens promised to bridge pop culture and digital finance, but their launches revealed a darker truth: structural vulnerabilities, whale dominance, and insider trading risks that leave retail investors exposed to catastrophic losses.YZY's tokenomics were a masterclass in favoring insiders. On-chain data shows that 70% of the supply was allocated to Yeezy Investments LLC, while 20% was reserved for public buyers. Yet, within hours of the token's launch on
, the top six wallets controlled over 90% of the supply. One whale, identified as “Naseem,” invested $250,000 in seconds after the launch and netted $2.12 million in profits by manipulating liquidity pools. This mirrors the TRUMP token's structure, where the Trump Organization reportedly controlled 80% of the supply, enabling strategic sell-offs during price spikes.The problem isn't just concentration—it's the tools insiders use to exploit it. YZY's liquidity pool was seeded exclusively with YZY tokens, not stablecoins like USDC, giving insiders unilateral control to manipulate pricing. By injecting or withdrawing USDC at will, the team could artificially inflate or deflate the token's value. This setup, reminiscent of the LIBRA rug pull, highlights a systemic flaw: liquidity isn't a public good but a weapon for the privileged.
Both YZY and TRUMP leveraged anti-sniping mechanisms—like deploying 25 identical token contracts—to deter bots. Yet, these measures were circumvented by whales with advance knowledge. For example, a wallet spent $2.2 million to acquire 2.7 million YZY tokens, securing $1.3 million in unrealized gains. Meanwhile, TRUMP's whale “Naseem” turned a $1.1 million investment into $100 million by timing trades with insider access.
The irony? These tokens market themselves as “fair” or “decentralized,” yet their structures are engineered to reward those with connections. Retail investors, lacking the resources or timing, are left to absorb losses. One YZY wallet lost $1.8 million in a week, while TRUMP's retail base collectively lost $2 billion during its crash.
The SEC's 2025 Working Group on
Markets has zeroed in on celebrity-backed tokens like YZY and TRUMP. With over 50% of supply controlled by insiders and no vesting schedules, these projects often fail the Howey Test, which defines securities. The lack of utility—YZY's “ecosystem” includes a speculative credit card, while TRUMP's value hinges on Trump's political influence—further underscores their status as speculative assets.For retail investors, the lesson is clear: celebrity-backed meme coins are high-risk, high-reward gambles that disproportionately benefit insiders. The volatility of YZY and TRUMP—peaking at $3.16 and $15 billion, respectively, only to crash—demonstrates the fragility of hype-driven markets.
YZY and TRUMP are cautionary tales. While celebrity endorsements can generate short-term hype, the structural flaws in these tokens—ownership concentration, liquidity manipulation, and insider advantages—make them unsuitable for most investors. As the crypto market matures, the focus will shift to projects with tangible value. Retail investors must resist the siren call of meme coins and prioritize transparency, utility, and decentralization.
In the end, the only winners in YZY and TRUMP's stories are the whales. Retailers? They're left holding the bag.
Decoding blockchain innovations and market trends with clarity and precision.

Sep.03 2025

Sep.03 2025

Sep.03 2025

Sep.03 2025

Sep.03 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet