Halliburton Surges 2.41% on $220M Volume, Ranked 451st in Market Activity

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Monday, Oct 13, 2025 6:49 pm ET1min read
HAL--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Halliburton (HAL) surged 2.41% on Oct 13, 2025, with $220M volume, ranking 451st in market activity.

- The rise aligns with energy sector volatility amid macroeconomic uncertainty, though no earnings or operational updates were cited.

- An RSI-based NVDA backtest (Jan 2022-Oct 2025) showed -0.60% total return, with poor metrics including -0.04% annualized return and 7.96% max drawdown.

- Proposed strategy adjustments include extending holding periods to 3-5 days, adding trend filters, or testing alternative RSI thresholds with MACD/volume indicators.

Halliburton (HAL) rose 2.41% on October 13, 2025, with a trading volume of $0.22 billion, ranking 451st in market activity for the day. The stock's performance appears linked to industry-specific developments, though no direct earnings or operational updates were cited in the referenced materials. Analysts have historically noted that energy sector volatility often drives short-term swings in oilfield services firms like HAL, particularly during periods of macroeconomic uncertainty.

Market participants observed that HAL's recent price action aligns with broader technical patterns seen in cyclical commodities. While no new contracts or regulatory changes were disclosed, traders emphasized that the stock's liquidity profile remains sensitive to global crude price fluctuations. The absence of headline news suggests the move may stem from algorithmic trading activity or sector rotation strategies favoring energy infrastructure plays.

Regarding the RSI-based backtest for NVDA from January 1, 2022, to October 13, 2025: the "RSI < 20, hold one day" strategy yielded a total return of -0.60%, with an annualized return of -0.04%. Key metrics include a maximum drawdown of 7.96%, a Sharpe ratio of -0.007, and an average trade return of -0.02%. The strategy demonstrated limited effectiveness, with 3.56% of winning trades offset by 2.71% average losses. The results indicate that this approach has not generated positive returns since 2022, with transaction costs likely exacerbating the negative edge. Proposed adjustments include extending the holding period to 3-5 days, incorporating trend filters like the 200-day moving average, or testing alternative RSI thresholds (e.g., 25, 30) alongside supplementary indicators such as MACD or volume spikes.

Encuentre esos activos con un volumen de transacciones explosivo.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet