Grok's Government Gamble: Why Musk's AI Play Poses Existual Risks to Tesla and SpaceX

Harrison BrooksFriday, May 23, 2025 11:55 pm ET
83min read

The U.S. government's quiet embrace of Elon Musk's AI tool Grok has ignited a firestorm of controversy, exposing vulnerabilities that could upend the trajectories of

(TSLA), SpaceX, and Musk's broader empire. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies and ethical breaches pile up, investors must confront a stark reality: Musk's growing influence over federal agencies is creating a minefield of legal, reputational, and financial risk. This article examines the perilous intersection of AI, power, and profit—and why shorting Musk-linked equities is now a prudent hedge against looming liabilities.

Conflict of Interest: A Structural Time Bomb

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Musk, has deployed Grok—a proprietary AI from Musk's company xAI—to sift through sensitive federal data. The goal? To root out waste, fraud, and abuse. But the setup is riddled with inherent conflicts. By funneling taxpayer-funded data into Grok, Musk's private firm xAI gains a trove of information it can leverage to refine its AI models. This creates a direct financial incentive for Musk to push Grok's adoption, even in agencies like the DHS, where its use lacks formal approval.

Legal experts warn this could breach federal conflict-of-interest laws. Former White House ethics counsel Richard Painter notes that using taxpayer resources to enrich a private entity—while Musk simultaneously holds public office—“crosses a constitutional line.” If proven, such violations could trigger fines, asset freezes, or even criminal charges under the Honest Services Fraud statute.

TSLA Closing Price

Data Privacy: A Catastrophic Liability

Grok's access to classified datasets—such as federal contracting records, employee communications, or personal information—has privacy advocates in a panic. xAI's terms state it may monitor users for “specific business purposes,” raising fears that Grok could transmit sensitive data back to Musk's companies. Albert Fox Cahn of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project calls this “a privacy apocalypse,” noting that Grok's flawed training data has even produced racially charged outputs, such as references to “white genocide,” when queried on unrelated topics.

For Tesla and SpaceX, the fallout could be existential. If Grok's misuse leads to a data breach—or if regulators force a shutdown of its government contracts—the reputational damage could deter partnerships, sour investor confidence, and spark lawsuits. Consider the precedent: In 2024, the Department of Homeland Security banned ChatGPT's use after discovering its insecure data handling. Grok's unauthorized deployment could trigger a similar backlash—this time with Musk's name on the liability.

Musk's Federal Play: A Recipe for Backlash

Musk's DOGE team has aggressively pushed Grok's adoption, even pressuring agencies like DHS to adopt it without approval. While the DHS denies coercion, internal sources confirm that Grok's use has been quietly mandated in operations. This overreach mirrors Musk's broader strategy: leveraging his public roles to advance private interests.

The risks extend beyond AI. DOGE's attempts to monitor employee emails for “political loyalty” to Trump's agenda—using algorithms to screen communications—violate civil service laws. Combined with Musk's refusal to disclose DOGE's records to federal watchdogs, these actions paint a pattern of systemic disregard for accountability.

Regulatory Risks: The Domino Effect

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has already taken aim at Musk for his dual roles, citing concerns about corporate governance. Now, Grok's deployment adds another layer of exposure. A class-action lawsuit could emerge if investors prove Tesla or SpaceX benefited from Grok's government use—a scenario that would force a reckoning with Musk's corporate governance.

Meanwhile, Congress is preparing hearings on AI in government. If Grok's ethical breaches are exposed, lawmakers could impose sweeping restrictions on Musk's ventures, including bans on federal contracts or audits of xAI's data practices. The stakes are existential: A 2025 Government Accountability Office report estimates that AI-driven efficiencies could save agencies $20 billion annually—but only if deployed responsibly.

Market Shifts: The AI Landscape is Realigning

The Grok controversy has already begun to reshape the AI race. Investors are now favoring companies with transparent governance and third-party audits. Competitors like Anthropic and OpenAI are capitalizing on the backlash, marketing their tools as “ethically certified” alternatives to Musk's opaque AI.

For Tesla, this shift is particularly acute. Its stock—already volatile—could face sustained pressure as institutional investors flee over governance concerns. The recent 0.15% post-earnings dip, while minor, hints at a market testing the limits of Musk's influence.

Investment Recommendation: Short Musk-Linked Equities

The calculus is clear: Musk's AI play is a high-risk bet with asymmetric downside. Shorting Tesla and SpaceX-linked assets (e.g., TSLA, SpaceX's private shares) is a defensive move against:
1. Regulatory fines: Potential penalties for conflict-of-interest violations could exceed $1 billion.
2. Lost contracts: If Grok is barred from government use, xAI's revenue streams vanish.
3. Reputational damage: ESG investors will shun Musk's companies, driving valuations lower.
4. Leadership distraction: Musk's focus on DOGE's legal battles could derail Tesla's production goals, as seen in its Q1 2025 delays.

TSLA, AI, SPCE, ANTX Closing Price
loading

Conclusion: The Costs of Power

Elon Musk's ambition to reshape government through Grok has backfired spectacularly. The risks to Tesla and SpaceX are no longer theoretical—they are compounding daily. As regulators, investors, and the public demand accountability, the smart play is to bet against Musk's ventures before the reckoning hits. Shorting now could be the most prudent hedge against a storm of his own making.

The question is no longer whether Musk's empire will face consequences—it's how severe they'll be. For investors, the answer is clear: Get out before the fallout begins.