Green Impact Partners’ FY 2024 Results Highlight Struggles, Hinge on High-Risk Projects

Green Impact Partners (GIP), a renewable energy and waste management firm, reported its fiscal year 2024 results on May 1, 2025, revealing a challenging year marked by declining revenue, operational setbacks, and critical liquidity risks. The company’s adjusted EBITDA fell into a $2.07 million loss, exacerbated by underperforming projects and a defaulted credit facility. While GIP remains focused on its ambitious $1.5 billion Future Energy Park (FEP), its immediate survival hinges on resolving technical, financial, and legal hurdles.

Financial Strains and Operational Challenges

GIP’s revenue dropped 10% year-over-year to $145.022 million, driven by lower oil prices and reduced volumes in its Energy Product Optimization Services segment. A deeper look at operations reveals conflicting trends:
- Water Treatment & Disposal: Gained 6% in volume, contributing a modest $0.2 million revenue rise.
- Solids Disposal & Recycling: Slumped 4%, with one facility—a key contributor—seeing a 26% volume decline.

The Colorado Joint Venture (JV) emerged as the largest drag on performance. Despite commercial gas production starting in 2024, unresolved design flaws led to a staggering $3.3 million EBITDA loss. A third-party engineering firm was enlisted to assess the EPC contractor’s role in the failures, culminating in a post-year-end Notice of Default. The JV’s EBITDA guidance was scrapped, erasing prior expectations of $12.3 million in 2025 contributions.

Credit Facility Default and Liquidity Crisis

GIP’s $100 million credit facility, due July 2025, is now in default after its 2024 audit included a “going-concern” qualification—a red flag signaling uncertainty about its ability to continue operations. Lenders could demand immediate repayment or seize collateral, forcing GIP to negotiate restructuring terms urgently.

Future Energy Park: The Hail Mary Play

The $1.5 billion FEP project, designed to convert agricultural waste into RNG, ethanol, and carbon credits, remains GIP’s salvation. Final regulatory approvals and financing are pending, with construction delayed until early 2025. If realized, FEP could generate:
- 4 million gigajoules of RNG annually
- 650,000 tonnes of carbon credits
- 300 million liters of ethanol

However, the project’s 25% equity requirement and reliance on project-level debt pose significant risks. Inflation has already pushed costs 33% higher than initial estimates, and securing financing in a volatile market remains uncertain.

Leadership Loss and Strategic Crossroads

The death of Geeta Sankappanavar, GIP’s founder and former board chair, adds emotional and strategic weight. Her vision for FEP was central to the company’s identity, and her absence heightens concerns about leadership continuity.

Investment Considerations

GIP’s shares now trade as a “distressed asset,” with risks outweighing near-term rewards. Key factors for investors include:
1. Colorado JV Resolution: Can GIP recover costs from its EPC contractor or renegotiate terms?
2. Credit Facility Restructuring: Will lenders grant forbearance, or will GIP face forced asset sales?
3. FEP Financing: Can the project secure debt/equity partnerships, or will cost overruns derail it?

Conclusion: A High-Reward, High-Risk Gamble

Green Impact Partners’ FY 2024 results underscore a company at a crossroads. Its adjusted EBITDA loss and defaulted credit facility signal immediate liquidity pressures, while its FEP project offers a potential turnaround—but only if technical, financial, and regulatory hurdles are overcome.

Investors must weigh GIP’s $145 million in annual revenue (despite declines) against its $22 million net loss and the sheer scale of FEP’s ambition. The stock’s performance over the past year () reflects this tension, with volatility likely to persist until key risks are resolved.

For now, GIP’s survival depends on executing a complex balancing act: resolving the Colorado JV’s technical issues, renegotiating its credit facility, and securing FEP financing. Until then, the company remains a speculative play for investors willing to bet on long-term renewable energy trends—and capable of enduring the turbulence in the interim.