US Government's $8.9 Billion Investment in Intel Sparks Outrage: Palantir Cofounder Calls it "Cronyism"
ByAinvest
Thursday, Sep 4, 2025 1:28 pm ET2min read
INTC--
The U.S. government's stake in Intel, totaling 9.9% through a $20.47-per-share investment, is part of a broader strategy to reindustrialize America's chipmaking capabilities and counterbalance the dominance of Asian manufacturing hubs. The investment is designed to support Intel's $100 billion U.S. manufacturing expansion, which includes high-volume production at its Arizona site and the development of sub-3nm nodes critical for AI accelerators and defense-grade microelectronics [2].
The government's involvement in Intel is not merely about corporate rescue; it is a strategic response to the existential threat posed by China's aggressive semiconductor ambitions and the vulnerabilities exposed by the global chip shortage crisis. By 2025, the U.S. had allocated $32.54 billion in grants and loans to 32 companies under the CHIPS and Science Act, with Intel receiving the lion's share [3].
While the investment provides Intel with much-needed capital and supports its long-term growth prospects, it also introduces complexities. The equity dilution has immediately impacted earnings per share for existing shareholders, and the company's international operations—76% of its revenue—face potential regulatory scrutiny [4]. However, the long-term upside is compelling, with analysts projecting Intel's stock could reach $40 by 2030, assuming successful execution of its manufacturing roadmap and a 30% operating margin by 2030 [5].
The global semiconductor landscape is being reshaped by AI demand, 5G adoption, and electric vehicle production. Intel's focus on AI infrastructure positions it to capitalize on this trend, while fierce competition from TSMC and Samsung remains a significant challenge [6]. The U.S. semiconductor devices market, valued at $9.17 billion in 2024, is projected to grow at a 7.3% CAGR through 2030 [7].
In conclusion, the U.S. government's investment in Intel is a strategic bet on the future of American technology leadership. While the move raises questions about the government's role in private companies and potential future investments in other industries, it is clear that the alignment of national security goals, CHIPS Act incentives, and AI-driven demand creates a compelling case for long-term investors. For those willing to navigate the volatility, Intel represents a unique opportunity to participate in the reshoring of a critical industry.
References:
[1] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/
[2] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-government-involvement-intel-bet-national-semiconductor-security-2508/
[3] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/
[4] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/
[5] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/
[6] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/
[7] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/
Palantir cofounder Joe Lonsdale has expressed discomfort with the US government's $8.9 billion investment in Intel, calling it "cronyism in some form." The funds are coming from the CHIPS Act, which supports domestic chip production. Lonsdale questioned the government's involvement in a private company and the potential for future investments in other industries.
The U.S. government's recent $8.9 billion investment in Intel has sparked debate among industry experts, with Palantir cofounder Joe Lonsdale questioning the wisdom of the move. The funds, sourced from the CHIPS Act, aim to bolster domestic semiconductor production and secure national security [1]. However, Lonsdale has expressed concern, describing the investment as "cronyism in some form," and raising questions about the government's role in private companies and potential future investments in other industries.The U.S. government's stake in Intel, totaling 9.9% through a $20.47-per-share investment, is part of a broader strategy to reindustrialize America's chipmaking capabilities and counterbalance the dominance of Asian manufacturing hubs. The investment is designed to support Intel's $100 billion U.S. manufacturing expansion, which includes high-volume production at its Arizona site and the development of sub-3nm nodes critical for AI accelerators and defense-grade microelectronics [2].
The government's involvement in Intel is not merely about corporate rescue; it is a strategic response to the existential threat posed by China's aggressive semiconductor ambitions and the vulnerabilities exposed by the global chip shortage crisis. By 2025, the U.S. had allocated $32.54 billion in grants and loans to 32 companies under the CHIPS and Science Act, with Intel receiving the lion's share [3].
While the investment provides Intel with much-needed capital and supports its long-term growth prospects, it also introduces complexities. The equity dilution has immediately impacted earnings per share for existing shareholders, and the company's international operations—76% of its revenue—face potential regulatory scrutiny [4]. However, the long-term upside is compelling, with analysts projecting Intel's stock could reach $40 by 2030, assuming successful execution of its manufacturing roadmap and a 30% operating margin by 2030 [5].
The global semiconductor landscape is being reshaped by AI demand, 5G adoption, and electric vehicle production. Intel's focus on AI infrastructure positions it to capitalize on this trend, while fierce competition from TSMC and Samsung remains a significant challenge [6]. The U.S. semiconductor devices market, valued at $9.17 billion in 2024, is projected to grow at a 7.3% CAGR through 2030 [7].
In conclusion, the U.S. government's investment in Intel is a strategic bet on the future of American technology leadership. While the move raises questions about the government's role in private companies and potential future investments in other industries, it is clear that the alignment of national security goals, CHIPS Act incentives, and AI-driven demand creates a compelling case for long-term investors. For those willing to navigate the volatility, Intel represents a unique opportunity to participate in the reshoring of a critical industry.
References:
[1] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/
[2] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-government-involvement-intel-bet-national-semiconductor-security-2508/
[3] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/
[4] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/
[5] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/
[6] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/
[7] https://www.ainvest.com/news/strategic-intel-national-security-backed-semiconductor-play-2509/

Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet