AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
In a significant development, a lawyer from the U.S. Department of Justice has expressed concerns that
, a subsidiary of , may be utilizing artificial intelligence to further expand its dominance in the search engine market. This comes as Google faces a historic antitrust lawsuit that could fundamentally reshape the landscape of the internet.The Department of Justice, along with a coalition of state attorneys general, is seeking to compel Google to take substantial measures to prevent the misuse of its AI products. These measures include the potential sale of Google's Chrome browser and other actions aimed at restoring competition in the search engine market. The case is being compared to past efforts to break up monopolies such as AT&T, Microsoft, and Standard Oil.
David Dahlquist, the Department of Justice lawyer, emphasized the need for proactive measures to address the evolving landscape of technology. He stated that the court's remedies should be forward-looking and not ignore the changes on the horizon. Witnesses from Perplexity AI and OpenAI are expected to testify about the overlap between search and AI, and how Google's dominance affects their businesses.
Google, however, has argued that its AI products are not within the scope of the current lawsuit, which primarily focuses on its search engine. The company maintains that the proposed remedies could hinder innovation at a critical juncture. Google plans to appeal the final decision of the case.
The Department of Justice and the coalition of state attorneys general have proposed sweeping measures to quickly open up the search market to new competitors. These measures include terminating Google's exclusive agreements with device manufacturers, such as Apple, which make Google the default search engine on their devices. Additionally, Google may be required to license its search results to competitors if other remedies fail to restore competition. In an extreme scenario, Google could be forced to sell its Android mobile operating system.
Google has countered these proposals, arguing that they amount to giving away its hard-earned innovations to competitors. The company has also expressed concerns that terminating payments to device manufacturers and browser developers could increase the cost of smartphones and jeopardize the survival of companies like Mozilla.
Despite the political landscape, the case remains a bipartisan effort to curb the power of big tech companies. The Department of Justice has emphasized that the remedies proposed are supported by both past and present administrations, indicating a consistent stance on antitrust enforcement. The case is part of a broader effort to address the monopolistic practices of major tech companies, which began under the Trump administration and continues under the Biden administration.

Stay ahead with real-time Wall Street scoops.

Nov.30 2025

Nov.30 2025

Nov.29 2025

Nov.29 2025

Nov.29 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet