icon
icon
icon
icon
Upgrade
Upgrade

News /

Articles /

GM's Q1 Earnings: A Tale of Domestic Strength and Global Struggles

Cyrus ColeSaturday, May 3, 2025 9:45 am ET
21min read

General Motors delivered mixed results in its Q1 2025 earnings report, showcasing resilience in its core North American market while grappling with global headwinds and strategic challenges. Let’s dissect three critical takeaways from the quarter that investors must consider.

1. Domestic Dominance, International Struggles

GM’s North American segment (GMNA) was the star of Q1, with 827,000 units sold, crushing analyst estimates of 768,770 units. This strength propelled GMNA’s revenue to $37.39 billion, a +3.6% YoY rise, and accounted for 91% of total automotive sales. The division’s success underscores GM’s ability to capitalize on strong demand for trucks and SUVs in its home market.

However, the Global Markets International (GMI) segment faltered, selling just 85,000 units—a 32% miss against estimates—and posting a -21.3% YoY revenue decline to $2.43 billion. Weakness in South Korea and Europe highlights vulnerabilities in GM’s international footprint, which now face additional pressure from U.S. tariffs.

2. Tariff Headwinds and Strategic Shifts

The 25% U.S. tariffs on imported vehicles—including those from Canada, Mexico, and South Korea—have become a major drag. Despite CEO Mary Barra’s earlier claims that GM could offset 50% of tariff costs, the company now admits to rising expenses. To preserve capital, GM has suspended additional share buybacks and is accelerating a strategic pivot: shifting production of key models like the Chevrolet Equinox to North America.

This move aims to reduce reliance on imports, but analysts question whether it can offset the 5.6% revenue decline they project for GM over the next 12 months. The company also reassessed its 2025 guidance, leaving investors uncertain about its path to profitability.

3. Cruise’s Stumbles and Free Cash Flow Gains

GM’s autonomous vehicle division, Cruise, delivered a stark reminder of its operational challenges. Revenue plummeted 96% YoY to just $1 million, reflecting delays in expanding its robotaxi service post-2023 safety incidents. Instead, Cruise is now focusing on personal autonomous vehicles, a shift that could take years to monetize.

On a brighter note, GM’s free cash flow margin surged to 9.6%—a +870% jump from Q1 2024’s 0.9%—thanks to cost-cutting and strong liquidity. Yet this gain came at a cost: operating margins fell to 7.6% from 8.7% a year ago, signaling margin pressure that could persist.

Conclusion: Caution Amid Resilience

GM’s Q1 results are a double-edged sword. Its North American dominance and improved free cash flow are positives, but the tariff-driven drag on margins, weak international performance, and Cruise’s struggles temper optimism. Analysts project a $10.69 EPS for 2025, relying more on buybacks than operational gains—a risky bet if tariffs persist.

With the stock trading at $47.11—up 6.5% YTD but down 2.3% post-earnings—the market is split. While GM outperforms peers like Rivian (RIVN) and Lucid (LCID), its Hold rating and mixed guidance suggest investors should proceed with caution.

The verdict? GM remains a hold until clarity emerges on tariffs and GMI’s turnaround. Until then, the company’s success hinges on executing its North America-first strategy while navigating a storm it can’t fully control.

Disclaimer: the above is a summary showing certain market information. AInvest is not responsible for any data errors, omissions or other information that may be displayed incorrectly as the data is derived from a third party source. Communications displaying market prices, data and other information available in this post are meant for informational purposes only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Please do your own research when investing. All investments involve risk and the past performance of a security, or financial product does not guarantee future results or returns. Keep in mind that while diversification may help spread risk, it does not assure a profit, or protect against loss in a down market.